Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object #15402

JeffBezanson · 2016-03-08T16:51:12Z

Test case:

immutable Wrap{T}
  x::T
end

function f(a::Wrap)
  s = 0.0
  for i = 1:length(a.x)
    @inbounds s += a.x[i]
  end
  s
end

@code_llvm f(Wrap(rand(2,2)))

Inner loop code in v0.4:

  %"#s1.0" = phi i64 [ %13, %L ], [ 1, %L.preheader ]
  %s.0 = phi double [ %17, %L ], [ 0.000000e+00, %L.preheader ]
  %13 = add i64 %"#s1.0", 1
  %14 = add i64 %"#s1.0", -1
  %15 = getelementptr double* %12, i64 %14
  %16 = load double* %15, align 8
  %17 = fadd double %s.0, %16
  %18 = icmp eq i64 %"#s1.0", %7
  br i1 %18, label %L3, label %L

Inner loop code on master:

  %s.02 = phi double [ %22, %if ], [ 0.000000e+00, %if.preheader ]
  %"#s1.01" = phi i64 [ %15, %if ], [ 1, %if.preheader ]
  %15 = add i64 %"#s1.01", 1
  %16 = load %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %8, align 8
  store %jl_value_t* %16, %jl_value_t** %3, align 8
  %17 = add i64 %"#s1.01", -1
  %18 = bitcast %jl_value_t* %16 to double**
  %19 = load double*, double** %18, align 8
  %20 = getelementptr double, double* %19, i64 %17
  %21 = load double, double* %20, align 8
  %22 = fadd double %s.02, %21
  %23 = icmp eq i64 %"#s1.01", %12
  br i1 %23, label %L2.loopexit, label %if

It seems to be rooting a.x on every iteration where we didn't before. This is one of the issues affecting #15146.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

yuyichao · 2016-03-08T16:56:00Z

Yeah, I've also just seen this for array stores.

yuyichao · 2016-03-31T18:16:51Z

On master the IR becames

if:                                               ; preds = %if.preheader, %if
  %s.04 = phi double [ %24, %if ], [ 0.000000e+00, %if.preheader ]
  %"#temp#.03" = phi i64 [ %17, %if ], [ 1, %if.preheader ]
  %17 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", 1
  store %jl_value_t* %0, %jl_value_t** %4, align 8
  %18 = load %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %10, align 8
  store %jl_value_t* %18, %jl_value_t** %5, align 8
  %19 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", -1
  %20 = bitcast %jl_value_t* %18 to double**
  %21 = load double*, double** %20, align 8
  %22 = getelementptr double, double* %21, i64 %19
  %23 = load double, double* %22, align 8
  %24 = fadd double %s.04, %23
  %25 = icmp eq i64 %"#temp#.03", %14
  br i1 %25, label %L2.loopexit, label %if

So we are rooting a at every iteration too and this starts to affect containers of bitstype too. Ref #15717

yuyichao · 2016-05-05T18:00:59Z

I think the inner loop is free of gc frame store now.

if:                                               ; preds = %if.lr.ph, %if
  %s.04 = phi double [ 0.000000e+00, %if.lr.ph ], [ %24, %if ]
  %"#temp#.03" = phi i64 [ 1, %if.lr.ph ], [ %20, %if ]
  %20 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", 1
  %21 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", -1
  %22 = getelementptr double, double* %18, i64 %21
  %23 = load double, double* %22, align 8
  %24 = fadd double %s.04, %23
  %25 = icmp eq i64 %"#temp#.03", %14
  br i1 %25, label %L.L2_crit_edge, label %if

However, the function still has two gc slot and it shouldn't need any.

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-05T18:19:42Z

Oh, very nice. I wonder what fixed that. Anyway this might be enough to get #7258 off the ground.

yuyichao · 2016-05-05T18:28:17Z

I believe it's #13463. Commenting the tbaa decoration out results in

if:                                               ; preds = %if.preheader, %if
  %s.04 = phi double [ %24, %if ], [ 0.000000e+00, %if.preheader ]
  %"#temp#.03" = phi i64 [ %17, %if ], [ 1, %if.preheader ]
  %17 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", 1
  %18 = load %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %10, align 8
  store %jl_value_t* %18, %jl_value_t** %4, align 8
  %19 = add i64 %"#temp#.03", -1
  %20 = bitcast %jl_value_t* %18 to double**
  %21 = load double*, double** %20, align 8
  %22 = getelementptr double, double* %21, i64 %19
  %23 = load double, double* %22, align 8
  %24 = fadd double %s.04, %23
  %25 = icmp eq i64 %"#temp#.03", %14
  br i1 %25, label %L2.loopexit, label %if

This is also why the GC slots are still there, the metadata merely allows llvm to move it out of the loop, not deleting it...

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-05T23:09:37Z

Ok, I've tried #7258 again. Here's where we are for this test case:

g(n) = [ i/10 for i=1:n ]

The inner loop:

if:                                               ; preds = %if.lr.ph, %if
  %i.09 = phi i64 [ %2, %if.lr.ph ], [ %15, %if ]
  %st.08 = phi i64 [ %3, %if.lr.ph ], [ %9, %if ]
  %9 = add i64 %st.08, 1
  %10 = sitofp i64 %st.08 to double
  %11 = fdiv double %10, 1.000000e+01
  %12 = add i64 %i.09, -1
  %13 = load double*, double** %8, align 8
  %14 = getelementptr double, double* %13, i64 %12
  store double %11, double* %14, align 8
  %15 = add i64 %i.09, 1
  %16 = load i64, i64* %4, align 8
  %17 = icmp eq i64 %st.08, %16
  br i1 %17, label %L5.loopexit, label %if

There are two extra loads, one for the array pointer and one for the range endpoint. So there is still a ~2x performance gap.

yuyichao · 2016-05-05T23:10:47Z

Does the ~~store~~ load gets moved out of the loop with -O3?

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-05T23:14:51Z

Interesting; with -O3 the array pointer load is hoisted, but the extra i64 load is still there.

yuyichao · 2016-05-05T23:19:15Z

I noticed a similar effect in #15717 (#13463 (comment)) The load of the end point is interesting. Maybe check Base.code_llvm(STDOUT, g, Tuple{Int}, false, true) to see why does LLVM think it is not ok to move it out? (Unless LLVM does this iteratively and don't want to move too many loads out at once....)

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-05T23:24:51Z

Here's the full output:

; ModuleID = 'collect_to!'
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"

%jl_value_t = type { %jl_value_t* }
%Generator.62 = type { [0 x i1], %UnitRange }
%UnitRange = type { i64, i64 }

define %jl_value_t* @"julia_collect_to!_55312"(%jl_value_t*, %Generator.62*, i64, i64) #0 {
top:
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %jl_value_t* null, i64 0, metadata !22, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %jl_value_t* null, i64 0, metadata !31, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %jl_value_t* null, i64 0, metadata !32, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %jl_value_t* %0, i64 0, metadata !22, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %Generator.62* %1, i64 0, metadata !23, metadata !39), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %2, i64 0, metadata !24, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %3, i64 0, metadata !25, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %2, i64 0, metadata !26, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  %4 = getelementptr inbounds %Generator.62, %Generator.62* %1, i64 0, i32 1, i32 1, !dbg !40
  %5 = load i64, i64* %4, align 8, !dbg !40
  %6 = add i64 %5, 1, !dbg !40
  %7 = icmp eq i64 %6, %3, !dbg !40
  br i1 %7, label %L5, label %if.lr.ph, !dbg !40

if.lr.ph:                                         ; preds = %top
  %8 = bitcast %jl_value_t* %0 to double**, !dbg !41
  %.pre = load double*, double** %8, align 8, !dbg !41, !tbaa !42
  br label %if, !dbg !40

L5.loopexit:                                      ; preds = %if
  br label %L5, !dbg !46

L5:                                               ; preds = %L5.loopexit, %top
  ret %jl_value_t* %0, !dbg !46

if:                                               ; preds = %if.lr.ph, %if
  %i.09 = phi i64 [ %2, %if.lr.ph ], [ %14, %if ]
  %st.08 = phi i64 [ %3, %if.lr.ph ], [ %9, %if ]
  %9 = add i64 %st.08, 1, !dbg !47
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %9, i64 0, metadata !35, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %9, i64 0, metadata !36, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  %10 = sitofp i64 %st.08 to double, !dbg !51
  %11 = fdiv double %10, 1.000000e+01, !dbg !51
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata double %11, i64 0, metadata !27, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %9, i64 0, metadata !25, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i1 true, i64 0, metadata !33, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  %12 = add i64 %i.09, -1, !dbg !41
  %13 = getelementptr double, double* %.pre, i64 %12, !dbg !41
  store double %11, double* %13, align 8, !dbg !41, !tbaa !52
  %14 = add i64 %i.09, 1, !dbg !53
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 %14, i64 0, metadata !26, metadata !37), !dbg !38
  %15 = load i64, i64* %4, align 8, !dbg !40
  %16 = icmp eq i64 %st.08, %15, !dbg !40
  br i1 %16, label %L5.loopexit, label %if, !dbg !40
}

define %jl_value_t* @"jlcall_collect_to!_55312"(%jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t**, i32) #0 {
top:
  %3 = call %jl_value_t*** @jl_get_ptls_states()
  %4 = alloca [3 x %jl_value_t*], align 8
  %.sub = getelementptr inbounds [3 x %jl_value_t*], [3 x %jl_value_t*]* %4, i64 0, i64 0
  %5 = getelementptr [3 x %jl_value_t*], [3 x %jl_value_t*]* %4, i64 0, i64 2
  store %jl_value_t* null, %jl_value_t** %5, align 8, !tbaa !54
  %6 = bitcast [3 x %jl_value_t*]* %4 to i64*
  store i64 2, i64* %6, align 8, !tbaa !54
  %7 = getelementptr [3 x %jl_value_t*], [3 x %jl_value_t*]* %4, i64 0, i64 1
  %8 = bitcast %jl_value_t*** %3 to i64*
  %9 = load i64, i64* %8, align 8
  %10 = bitcast %jl_value_t** %7 to i64*
  store i64 %9, i64* %10, align 8, !tbaa !54
  store %jl_value_t** %.sub, %jl_value_t*** %3, align 8
  %11 = load %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %1, align 8
  %12 = getelementptr %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %1, i64 1
  %13 = bitcast %jl_value_t** %12 to %Generator.62**
  %14 = load %Generator.62*, %Generator.62** %13, align 8
  %15 = getelementptr %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %1, i64 2
  %16 = bitcast %jl_value_t** %15 to i64**
  %17 = load i64*, i64** %16, align 8
  %18 = load i64, i64* %17, align 8
  %19 = getelementptr %jl_value_t*, %jl_value_t** %1, i64 3
  %20 = bitcast %jl_value_t** %19 to i64**
  %21 = load i64*, i64** %20, align 8
  %22 = load i64, i64* %21, align 8
  %23 = call %jl_value_t* @"julia_collect_to!_55312"(%jl_value_t* %11, %Generator.62* %14, i64 %18, i64 %22) #0
  store %jl_value_t* %23, %jl_value_t** %5, align 8, !tbaa !54
  %24 = load i64, i64* %10, align 8, !tbaa !54
  store i64 %24, i64* %8, align 8, !tbaa !54
  ret %jl_value_t* %23
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
declare %jl_value_t*** @jl_get_ptls_states() #1

; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1

; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, i64, metadata, metadata) #1

attributes #0 = { "no-frame-pointer-elim"="true" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }

!llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1}
!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!2}

!0 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
!1 = !{i32 1, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
!2 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C89, file: !3, producer: "julia", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: 1, enums: !4, subprograms: !5)
!3 = !DIFile(filename: "array.jl", directory: ".")
!4 = !{}
!5 = !{!6}
!6 = !DISubprogram(name: "collect_to!", linkageName: "julia_collect_to!_55328", scope: null, file: !3, type: !7, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, isOptimized: true, function: %jl_value_t* (%jl_value_t*, %Generator.62*, i64, i64)* @"julia_collect_to!_55312", variables: !19)
!7 = !DISubroutineType(types: !8)
!8 = !{!9, !13, !18, !18}
!9 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !10, size: 64, align: 64)
!10 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "jl_value_t", file: !11, line: 71, align: 64, elements: !12)
!11 = !DIFile(filename: "julia.h", directory: "")
!12 = !{!9}
!13 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "Generator", size: 128, align: 64, elements: !14, runtimeLang: DW_LANG_Julia)
!14 = !{!15, !16}
!15 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "#a", align: 8, elements: !4, runtimeLang: DW_LANG_Julia)
!16 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "UnitRange", size: 128, align: 64, elements: !17, runtimeLang: DW_LANG_Julia)
!17 = !{!18, !18}
!18 = !DIBasicType(name: "Int64", size: 64, align: 64, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned)
!19 = !{!20, !22, !23, !24, !25, !26, !27, !29, !30, !31, !32, !33, !35, !36, !29}
!20 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, name: "#self#", arg: 1, scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !21)
!21 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "#collect_to!", elements: !4, runtimeLang: DW_LANG_Julia)
!22 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, name: "dest", arg: 2, scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !9)
!23 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, name: "itr", arg: 3, scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !13)
!24 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, name: "offs", arg: 4, scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!25 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, name: "st", arg: 5, scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!26 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "i", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!27 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "el", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !28)
!28 = !DIBasicType(name: "Float64", size: 64, align: 64, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned)
!29 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "#temp#", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!30 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "S", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !9)
!31 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "R", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !9)
!32 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "new", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !9)
!33 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "#temp#", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !34)
!34 = !DIBasicType(name: "Bool", size: 1, align: 8, encoding: DW_ATE_unsigned)
!35 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "v", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!36 = !DILocalVariable(tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, name: "s2", scope: !6, file: !3, line: 267, type: !18)
!37 = !DIExpression()
!38 = !DILocation(line: 267, scope: !6)
!39 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref)
!40 = !DILocation(line: 268, column: 1, scope: !6)
!41 = !DILocation(line: 272, column: 1, scope: !6)
!42 = !{!"jtbaa_arrayptr", !43}
!43 = !{!"jtbaa_array", !44}
!44 = !{!"jtbaa_value", !45}
!45 = !{!"jtbaa"}
!46 = !DILocation(line: 282, column: 1, scope: !6)
!47 = !DILocation(line: 21, column: 1, scope: !48, inlinedAt: !50)
!48 = !DILexicalBlockFile(scope: !6, file: !49, discriminator: 0)
!49 = !DIFile(filename: "generator.jl", directory: ".")
!50 = !DILocation(line: 269, column: 1, scope: !6)
!51 = !DILocation(line: 22, column: 1, scope: !48, inlinedAt: !50)
!52 = !{!"jtbaa_user", !45}
!53 = !DILocation(line: 273, column: 1, scope: !6)
!54 = !{!"jtbaa_gcframe", !45}

yuyichao · 2016-05-05T23:30:15Z

What type is %Generator.62? Is it mutable? It looks like we are somehow missing a tbaa_user (if it's mutable) or tbaa_immut (if it's immutable) for the load from %4.

yuyichao · 2016-05-06T00:17:57Z

Reproduced with

f(i) = i / 10
immutable Gen
    iter::UnitRange{Int}
end
Base.start(g::Gen) = start(g.iter)
Base.done(g::Gen, s) = done(g.iter, s)
function Base.next(g::Gen, s)
    v, s2 = next(g.iter, s)
    f(v), s2
end
gen = Gen(1:10)
function collect_to2!{T}(dest::AbstractArray{T}, itr)
    i = 1
    st = start(itr)
    while !done(itr, st)
        el, st = next(itr, st)
        @inbounds dest[i] = el
        i += 1
    end
    return dest
end
@code_llvm collect_to2!(Vector{Float64}(10), gen)
@show collect_to2!(Vector{Float64}(10), gen)

seems to be unrelated to GC root (the above function doesn't have one) Might be related to #13104

Ref JuliaLang/julia#15402 (comment)

tkelman · 2016-05-12T16:29:47Z

@yuyichao is this completely fixed by #16230 or is more work needed?

yuyichao · 2016-05-12T16:33:34Z

It still need work

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-13T14:54:19Z

We are now at performance parity for [ i/10 for i=1:n ]. Excellent progress. 🎉

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-13T15:36:07Z

The next case is 2d, which is much harder as it uses a Product iterator. Here's a test case:

G = ((i+j)/1000 for i=1:2000, j=1:2000)

@code_llvm Base.collect_to!(zeros(2000,2000), G, 1, start(G))

Here's the inner loop:

if:                                               ; preds = %if.lr.ph, %if
  %i.07 = phi i64 [ %2, %if.lr.ph ], [ %35, %if ]
  call void @julia_next_54517({ double, { i64, i64, %Nullable.27, i8 } }* nonnull sret %4, %Generator.58* %1, { i64, i64, %Nullable.27, i8 }* nonnull %st) #0
  %26 = load i64, i64* %20, align 8
  %27 = load i64, i64* %21, align 8
  %28 = load i64, i64* %22, align 8
  %29 = load i8, i8* %23, align 8
  %30 = load i64, i64* %24, align 8
  %31 = load i8, i8* %25, align 8
  store i64 %27, i64* %6, align 8
  store i64 %28, i64* %8, align 8
  store i8 %29, i8* %10, align 8
  store i64 %30, i64* %12, align 8
  store i8 %31, i8* %14, align 8
  %32 = add i64 %i.07, -1
  %33 = getelementptr double, double* %19, i64 %32
  %34 = bitcast double* %33 to i64*
  store i64 %26, i64* %34, align 8
  %35 = add i64 %i.07, 1
  %36 = and i8 %31, 1
  %37 = icmp eq i8 %36, 0
  br i1 %37, label %if, label %L4.loopexit

Somewhat amazingly, this is only 30% slower than 0.4. Adding @_inline_meta for Generator iteration removes the function call and gets us within ~10%. However, another interesting feature of the above code is that it gets much slower (almost 2x) with -O3, since it gets "vectorized" but the vectors are constantly stored to the stack (at least I think that's the problem). In the better, fully-inlined version -O3 doesn't cause a problem.

yuyichao · 2016-05-13T15:45:11Z

Somewhat amazingly, this is only 30% slower than 0.4. Adding @_inline_meta for Generator iteration removes the function call and gets us within ~10%.

I assume the current version is basically fully inlined so if the performance is only different by 10% with inlining, this seems to be a inlining problem?

JeffBezanson · 2016-05-13T15:47:17Z

Well, I'm happy to add the extra @inline declaration, but from there a 10% slowdown is still not good and is probably due to the messy product iterator state.

yuyichao · 2016-06-09T16:40:26Z

The consensus right now seems to be track these in a single issue. So move to #15369 (comment)

yuyichao · 2016-06-09T16:40:43Z

(Given that the performance issue for the inner loop isn't there anymore)

JeffBezanson added performance Must go faster kind:regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version compiler:codegen Generation of LLVM IR and native code labels Mar 8, 2016

yuyichao mentioned this issue Mar 31, 2016

Store to GC frame preventing vectorization #15717

Closed

yuyichao mentioned this issue Mar 31, 2016

Unnecessary GC root preceding arrayset #15719

Closed

JeffBezanson mentioned this issue May 5, 2016

type-inference-independent comprehensions #7258

Closed

yuyichao changed the title ~~excess GC frame store when iterating over a wrapped object~~ Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object May 5, 2016

yuyichao added a commit to yuyichao/explore that referenced this issue May 6, 2016

Test for missing TBAA on field load

b10548b

Ref JuliaLang/julia#15402 (comment)

yuyichao mentioned this issue May 6, 2016

Track TBAA metadata in jl_cgval_t #16230

Merged

JeffBezanson mentioned this issue May 27, 2016

0.5-style comprehensions #16622

Merged

4 tasks

yuyichao mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2016

Very inefficient GC frame generation #15369

Closed

yuyichao closed this as completed Jun 9, 2016

yuyichao mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2016

Vectorization depends on silly details #16894

Closed

JeffBezanson mentioned this issue Jul 8, 2016

Another unnecessary GC root #17342

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object #15402

Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object #15402

JeffBezanson commented Mar 8, 2016

yuyichao commented Mar 8, 2016

yuyichao commented Mar 31, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 6, 2016

tkelman commented May 12, 2016

yuyichao commented May 12, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading

yuyichao commented May 13, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016

yuyichao commented Jun 9, 2016

yuyichao commented Jun 9, 2016

Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object #15402

Unnecessary GC root for getfield of SSA immutable object #15402

Comments

JeffBezanson commented Mar 8, 2016

yuyichao commented Mar 8, 2016

yuyichao commented Mar 31, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 • edited Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 • edited Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 • edited by yuyichao Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 • edited Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 • edited by yuyichao Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016

yuyichao commented May 6, 2016

tkelman commented May 12, 2016

yuyichao commented May 12, 2016 • edited Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016 • edited by yuyichao Loading

yuyichao commented May 13, 2016

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016

yuyichao commented Jun 9, 2016

yuyichao commented Jun 9, 2016

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading

yuyichao commented May 5, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 5, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading

yuyichao commented May 12, 2016 •

edited

Loading

JeffBezanson commented May 13, 2016 •

edited by yuyichao

Loading