Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

unexpected error in runtime: AssertionError(msg="invalid inlining item") on 1.8 #45440

Closed
KristofferC opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

unexpected error in runtime: AssertionError(msg="invalid inlining item") on 1.8 #45440

KristofferC opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@aviatesk
Labels
kind:bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior kind:regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version
Milestone
1.8

Comments

@KristofferC
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Found in the PkgEval logs for 1.8: https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/6acc46b_vs_3e092a2/PowerSimulationsDynamics.primary.log. Reproduces locally.

Talked to @aviatesk and he said he would look at it.
@KristofferC KristofferC added kind:bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior kind:regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version labels May 24, 2022
@KristofferC KristofferC added this to the 1.8 milestone May 24, 2022
@KristofferC KristofferC changed the title unexpected error in runtime: AssertionError(msg="invalid inlining item") on 1.8 unexpected error in runtime: AssertionError(msg="invalid inlining item") on 1.8 May 24, 2022
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2022
@aviatesk
fix #45440, improve the robustness of concrete-evaled callsite inlining
5b5faba
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2022
@aviatesk
fix #45440, improve the robustness of concrete-evaled callsite inlining
8bca2f4
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2022
@aviatesk
Revert "fix #45440, improve the robustness of concrete-evaled callsit…
678b21f 
…e inlining (#45451)"

This reverts commit 08a9c12.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2022
@aviatesk
follow #45440, add assertion to check concrete-eval call is compileable
0ee2584
@aviatesk aviatesk mentioned this issue May 27, 2022
Merged
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2022
@aviatesk
Merge pull request #45478 from JuliaLang/avi/follow-45440
18bdbbf 
follow #45440, add assertion to check concrete-eval call is compileable
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2022
@aviatesk
Revert "fix #45440, improve the robustness of concrete-evaled callsit…
bde7223 
…e inlining"

This reverts commit 8bca2f4.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2022
@aviatesk
follow #45440, add assertion to check concrete-eval call is compileable
801458d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@aviatesk aviatesk

Labels
kind:bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior kind:regression Regression in behavior compared to a previous version
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@KristofferC @aviatesk