Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.6] Limit whitespace job to run on only x86_64 machines #45665

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 14, 2022

Conversation

staticfloat
Copy link
Sponsor Member

This should fix the Exec format error problems we've had recently due to us adding some non-x86_64 linux workers to the pool.

This should fix the `Exec format error` problems we've had recently due to us adding some non-x86_64 linux workers to the pool.
@staticfloat staticfloat marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2022 16:39
@staticfloat staticfloat requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2022 16:39
@staticfloat staticfloat changed the title Limit whitespace job to run on only x86_64 machines [release-1.6] Limit whitespace job to run on only x86_64 machines Jun 13, 2022
@KristofferC KristofferC merged commit d85e7e7 into backports-release-1.6 Jun 14, 2022
@KristofferC KristofferC deleted the sf/limit_whitespace_arch branch June 14, 2022 06:59
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2022
This should fix the `Exec format error` problems we've had recently due to us adding some non-x86_64 linux workers to the pool.
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2022
45 tasks
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2022
This should fix the `Exec format error` problems we've had recently due to us adding some non-x86_64 linux workers to the pool.
staticfloat added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2022
This should fix the `Exec format error` problems we've had recently due to us adding some non-x86_64 linux workers to the pool.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants