Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Float16 erfinv and erfcinv simplifications. #474

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

oscardssmith
Copy link
Member

Followup to #372. This manages to remove a one of the branches by pushing the domain split further, and makes erfcinv use the better version I found for erfinv in the original PR.

Followup to #372. This manages to remove a one of the branches by pushing the domain split further, and makes `erfcinv` use the better version I found for erfinv in the original PR.
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.48%. Comparing base (c400278) to head (f4951b2).

Files Patch % Lines
src/erf.jl 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #474       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   94.10%   51.48%   -42.62%     
===========================================
  Files          14       14               
  Lines        2935     2886       -49     
===========================================
- Hits         2762     1486     -1276     
- Misses        173     1400     +1227     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 51.48% <50.00%> (-42.62%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

Seems to be less accurate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants