Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.squareup:kotlinpoet to v1.14.2 #213

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

juul-mobile-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.squareup:kotlinpoet dependencies minor 1.13.2 -> 1.14.2

⚠ Dependency Lookup Warnings ⚠

Warnings were logged while processing this repo. Please check the logs for more information.


Release Notes

square/kotlinpoet

v1.14.2

Compare Source

  • Fix: Fix one more missing API in binary compatibility override in Annotatable.Builder (#​1581).

v1.14.1

Compare Source

  • Fix: Restore ABI stability for annotatable and documentable builders (#​1580).

v1.14.0

Compare Source

Thanks to @​Omico, @​drawers, @​RBusarow for contributing to this release.

  • New: Kotlin 1.8.21.

  • New: KSP 1.8.21-1.0.11.

  • New: Enable default methods in Java bytecode (#​1561).

  • New: Group Kotlin and Renovate updates together in Renovate (#​1562).

  • New: Extract trait interface for annotatable constructs and their builders (#​1564).

  • New: Extract trait interface for documentable constructs and their builders (#​1571).

  • New: Document the usage of STAR (#​1572).

  • New: Add builder for FunSpec which accepts a MemberName (#​1574).

  • Fix: Omit public modifier on override function or constructor parameters (#​1550).

  • Fix: Correct handling of members in various types (#​1558).

  • Fix: Function return types now default to Unit unless explicitly set (#​1559).

    Previously the default was null which behaved like Unit for block bodies. When an expression body was produced,
    however, no return type would be emitted. This meant that the return type was implicit based on the contents of
    the body.

    With this change, when no return type is specified and an expression body is produced, the return type will be
    explicitly Unit. Specify the actual return type explicitly to correct the output.

    Old versions:

    val funSpec = FunSpec.builder("foo")
      .addStatement("return 1")
      .build()
    public fun foo() = 1

    This version, incorrect:

    val funSpec = FunSpec.builder("foo")
      .addStatement("return 1")
      .build()
    public fun foo(): Unit = 1 //

    This version, correct:

     val funSpec = FunSpec.builder("foo")
    +  .returns(INT)
       .addStatement("return 1")
       .build()
    public fun foo(): Int = 1 //

    Additionally, as part of this change, FunSpec.returnType has changed to be non-nullable. This is a source- and
    binary-compatible change, although if you were performing null-checks then new warnings may appear after upgrade.

  • Fix: Append nested class names to alias during name lookup (#​1568).

  • Fix: Allow PropertySpec with context receivers and without getter or setter (#​1575).


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Test Results

  5 files  ±0    5 suites  ±0   29s ⏱️ -3s
17 tests ±0  17 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
19 runs  ±0  19 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c334602. ± Comparison against base commit c9ed654.

@cedrickcooke cedrickcooke enabled auto-merge (squash) June 2, 2023 16:30
@cedrickcooke cedrickcooke merged commit 72abf42 into main Jun 2, 2023
@twyatt twyatt deleted the renovate/com.squareup branch June 2, 2023 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants