Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should camera have a name property? #234

Closed
pjcozzi opened this issue Feb 20, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Should camera have a name property? #234

pjcozzi opened this issue Feb 20, 2014 · 3 comments
Labels
specification

Comments

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Member

pjcozzi commented Feb 20, 2014

The converter currently outputs:

"cameras": {
        "camera_0": {
            "perspective": {
                "aspect_ratio": 1.5,
                "yfov": 37.8492,
                "zfar": 10000,
                "znear": 1
            },
            "type": "perspective"
        }
    },

The old schema allows for a name property similar to a node. Should we keep it?
@pjcozzi pjcozzi mentioned this issue Feb 20, 2014
Closed
@fabrobinet
Copy link
Contributor

yes we should

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Member Author

pjcozzi commented Feb 20, 2014

OK

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Member Author

pjcozzi commented Mar 7, 2014

Schema is updated.

@pjcozzi pjcozzi closed this as completed Mar 7, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pjcozzi @fabrobinet