-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing for core.Selections #362
Comments
I just opened #371 on the overhaul of the selection module. Either we wait until then to expand testing, or push for it asap, so that the overhaul occurs already under better testing. |
We need the tests one way or the other and before we get #371 into the mainline I'd actually like to know that the old system is fully working. So I'd say there's no harm in adding a test whenever you feel like ;-). |
richardjgowers
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2015
Start of Issue #362 Removed: CASelection (wasn't accessible anyway?) BondedSelection (wasn't fully implemented) NUCLEICXSTAL (only the name existed?)
Merged
richardjgowers
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2015
Added distance selection tests for with/without PBC Finishes Issue #362
orbeckst
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 3, 2015
updates/fixes for selections (related to #362) - unused code was removed - bonded selections fully implemented - performance improvements
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Coverage for the Selection system is 79%, it looks like many distance based selections have been missed out.
I know @mnmelo is working on Selections currently, so may wait on him commenting before writing some new tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: