Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display the credentials for the embedded tower in the playbook catalog UI dropdowns #627

Conversation

lgalis
Copy link
Contributor

@lgalis lgalis commented Mar 8, 2017

Display the credentials for the embedded tower in the playbook catalog UI dropdowns

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/140681979

@lgalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

lgalis commented Mar 8, 2017

@miq-bot add_label enhancement, automtion/ansible_tower
@miq-bot assign @h-kataria

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 8, 2017

@lgalis Cannot apply the following label because they are not recognized: automtion/ansible_tower

@lgalis lgalis force-pushed the ansible_embedded_credentials_in_catalog_item_ui branch from 9ea9d4f to fb731db Compare March 8, 2017 16:41
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 8, 2017

Checked commit lgalis@fb731db with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍰

@chessbyte chessbyte changed the title Display the crdentials for the embedded tower in the playbook catalog UI dropdowns Display the credentials for the embedded tower in the playbook catalog UI dropdowns Mar 8, 2017
@h-kataria
Copy link
Contributor

verified in UI, looks good.

@h-kataria
Copy link
Contributor

@gmcculloug please review.

@gmcculloug
Copy link
Member

@h-kataria This resolves the issue we are seeing with displaying wrong credentials. Thanks.

@h-kataria h-kataria added this to the Sprint 56 Ending Mar 13, 2017 milestone Mar 8, 2017
@h-kataria h-kataria merged commit 5857a28 into ManageIQ:master Mar 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants