fix: proofreading pub std and licences

docs/50_data_publication/30_licences.mdx

@@ -7,21 +7,21 @@ import useBaseUrl from "@docusaurus/useBaseUrl";
 
 # Licences
 
-Licences for research data often cause confusion among researchers. One of the main reasons for this is the interplay between **licences used for research data** and the requirements for referencing previous scientific work on which the current work is based, in accordance with the [Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice (DFG Code)](https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/en/code-of-conduct/). 
+Licences for research data often cause confusion among researchers. One of the main reasons for this is the interplay between **licences used for research data** and the requirements for referencing previous scientific work on which the current work is based, in accordance with the [Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice (DFG Code of Conduct)](https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/en/code-of-conduct/). 
 
-The DFG Code requires researchers to cite original sources, i.e. to include original sources in reference sections. Providing a licence for research data is a way to provide permission to share and reuse the data.
+The DFG Code of Conduct requires researchers to cite original sources, i.e. to include original sources in reference sections. Providing a licence for research data is a way to provide permission to share and reuse the data.
 
-Work on dedicated licences for research data is ongoing. Until these licences are available, we recommend switching to [Creative Commons]((https://creativecommons.org/)) licences, which were developed for the licensing of creative works.
+Work on dedicated licences for research data is ongoing. Until these licences are available, we recommend switching to [Creative Commons]((https://creativecommons.org/)) licences, which were developed to license creative works.
 
 :::info Recommendation:
-NFDI4Chem recommends the use the least restritive [Creative Commons](https://creativecommons.org/) licences such as [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/) and [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en) 
+NFDI4Chem recommends the use the least restrictive [Creative Commons](https://creativecommons.org/) licences such as [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/) and [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en) 
 :::
 
 :::danger Notice:
 As a first starting point for further information, we strongly recommend the page on [Licenses for research data](https://radar.products.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/radarfeatures/lizenzen-fuer-forschungsdaten) provided by FIZ Karlsruhe, which also includes information on certain rights that authors cannot waive in Germany, that copyright only protects personal intellectual creations, and that isolated research data are not protected by copyright.  
 :::
 
-Disclaimer: It should be checked on a case-by-case basis whether or not research data is protected by copyright. If the copyright status is unclear, please contact a legal professional at your institution.
+Disclaimer: It should be checked on a case-by-case basis whether research data is protected by copyright. If the copyright status is unclear, please contact a legal professional at your institution.
 
 In order to provide you with further helpful information, we have compiled a list of links:
 
@@ -31,4 +31,4 @@ In order to provide you with further helpful information, we have compiled a lis
 - [Creative Commons - About CC Licenses](https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/) 
 - [Creative Commons - License Chooser](https://creativecommons.org/choose/)
 - [Forschungsdaten in den Naturwissenschaften: Eine urheberrechtliche Bestandsaufnahme mit ihren Implikationen für universitäres FDM](https://doi.org/10.11588/heibooks.979.c13728) (in German)
-- [Open Knowledge Foundation - Open Data Commons](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/)
+- [Open Knowledge Foundation - Open Data Commons](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/)

docs/50_data_publication/70_publishing_standards/10_publishing_standards_authors.mdx

@@ -3,19 +3,19 @@ title: "For Authors"
 slug: "/publishing_standards_authors"
 ---
 
-### Use ORCID iD to Identifiy Authors and ROR to Identifiy Institutions
+### Use ORCID iD to identifiy authors and ROR to identifiy institutions
 
 :::tip Standard
 _Authors should provide their ORCID iD to identify the authors/creators and contributors, and their ROR identifier to identify the institution to which they are affiliated._
 :::
 
-ORCID iDs allow authors to be uniquely identified, whereas author names may not be unique, may change, or may have different ordering conventions depending on cultural differences. Similarly, affiliations can vary according to style and granularity. In order to uniquely identify the institutions to which authors are affiliated, the ROR identifier should be provided. Please note that the ROR identifier is not intended to resolve down to the departmental level. Nevertheless, both identifiers improve findability.
+ORCID iDs allow authors to be uniquely identified, whereas author names may not be unique, may change, or may have different ordering conventions depending on cultural differences. Similarly, affiliations can vary according to style and granularity. In order to uniquely identify the institutions to which authors are affiliated, the ROR identifier should be provided. Please note that the ROR identifier is not intended to resolve down to the department level, as the stability of institutional units decrease, the finer the granularity. Both identifiers improve findability as well as traceability of your scientific work.
 
-### How to use Dataset PIDs in Scientific Articles
+### How to use dataset PIDs in scientific articles
 
 During deposition of research data, a [persistent identifier (PID)](/docs/pid) is assigned to the data. Authors should use PIDs in their scientific article for interlinking and referencing in **two main ways**:
 
-#### How to use Dataset PIDs of own Datasets in Scientific articles
+#### How to use dataset PIDs of own datasets in scientific articles
 
 :::tip Standard
 _Authors should add the PID of their corresponding dataset(s) to the data availability statement and should add PIDs of dataset(s) to the reference section in order to specifically cite dataset(s)._
@@ -27,29 +27,29 @@ For corresponding data, i.e. directly underlying the results reported in the art
 This distinction is important, because **the link** to the dataset in CrossRef's DOI metadata of scientific articles **is differently set**, depending on whether the dataset is a directly related source of information or a specifically referenced resource.
 :::
 
-#### How to use Dataset PIDs for Datasets by other Researchers in Scientific articles
+#### How to use dataset PIDs for datasets by other researchers in scientific articles
 
 :::tip Standard
 _Authors should include PIDs for datasets published by other researchers that have been reused in the references, rather than citing the corresponding article._
 :::
 
 For datasets published by other researchers and reused in a study, include the dataset PID in the reference section of the manuscript and cite within the text accordingly.
 
-### How to Link Datasets to their Corresponding Scientific Article
+### How to link datasets to their corresponding scientific article
 
 :::tip Standard
 _Researchers should link their datasets to be published to their corresponding articles by adding the article DOI to the dataset's DataCite metadata as a related identifier._
 :::
 
 Research data repositories offer the option to add a related identifier to link datasets to related resources, such as a corresponding article. This considerably enhances the [FAIRness](/docs/fair/) of datasets, mainly the findability ([F2](/docs/fair/#f2-data-are-described-with-rich-metadata-defined-by-r1-below)) as well as the interoperability ([I3](/docs/fair/#i3-metadata-include-qualified-references-to-other-metadata)).
 
-### Usage of Relation Type for Linking Datasets with Scientific Articles
+### Usage of relation type for linking datasets with scientific articles
 
 :::tip Standard
 _Researchers should link their datasets to be published to their corresponding articles using the relation type `IsSupplementTo`._
 :::
 
-According to the [DataCite Metadata Schema](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/), [`IsCitedBy`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#iscitedby) and [`IsSupplementTo`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#issupplementto) are both recommended for discovery. For published articles, [CrossRef's documentation on relationships](https://www.crossref.org/documentation/schema-library/markup-guide-metadata-segments/relationships/) recommends that `isSupplmenetTo` should be used to link datasets generated as part of research results.
+According to the [DataCite Metadata Schema](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/), [`IsCitedBy`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#iscitedby) and [`IsSupplementTo`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#issupplementto) are both recommended for discovery. For published articles, [CrossRef's documentation on relationships](https://www.crossref.org/documentation/schema-library/markup-guide-metadata-segments/relationships/) recommends that `isSupplmenetTo` should be used to link datasets generated as part of research results. Please note that some repositories automatically detect whether the linked object is an article or some other dataset published in another repository, and therefore don't require authors to specify a relation(ship) type.
 
 ### Usage of Collection DOIs
 

docs/50_data_publication/70_publishing_standards/20_publishing_standards_publishers.mdx

@@ -3,31 +3,31 @@ title: "For Academic Publishers"
 slug: "/publishing_standards_publishers"
 ---
 
-### Recommendations for Trusted, Chemistry-friendly Repositories
+### Recommendations for trusted, chemistry-friendly repositories
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journals should recommend trusted, chemistry-friendly research data repositories.*
 :::
 
 To assist authors in selecting **well-established and community-specific [repositories](/docs/repositories/)** for their research data, [trusted chemistry friendly repositories](/docs/choose_repository/) should be recommended by journals. These should be included within the author guidelines or the data policies.
 
-### Recommendations to Include Data Availability Statements
+### Recommendations to include data availability statements
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journals should recommend that authors provide a data availability statement. Author guidelines should also provide templates for illustration.*
 :::
 
-[Templates](/docs/data_availability_statement/#templates-for-data-availability-statements) for [**data availability statements**](/docs/data_availability_statement) or a similarly termed section should be made available to authors in the journal's author guidelines. This guides authors in correctly submitting underlying data with their manuscript and effectively communicating how to find and access the data by including the DOI or other PID, enabling the FAIR principles (e.g. [A1](docs/fair#a1-metadata-are-retrievable-by-their-identifier-using-a-standardized-communications-protocol), [I3](/docs/fair#i3-metadata-include-qualified-references-to-other-metadata)). It should also be mentioned whether templates are selectable and information should be provided via the manuscript submission system.
+[Templates](/docs/data_availability_statement/#templates-for-data-availability-statements) for [**data availability statements**](/docs/data_availability_statement) or a similarly termed section should be made available to authors in the journal's author guidelines. This guides authors in correctly submitting underlying data with their manuscript and effectively communicating how to find and access the data by including the DOI or other PID, enabling the FAIR principles (e.g. [A1](docs/fair#a1-metadata-are-retrievable-by-their-identifier-using-a-standardized-communications-protocol), [I3](/docs/fair#i3-metadata-include-qualified-references-to-other-metadata)). It should also be mentioned whether the templates are selectable and the information should be provided via the manuscript submission system or whether this information should be manually inserted into the initially submitted manuscript by the authors.
 
-### Data Availability Statements and Manuscript Submission Systems 
+### Data availability statements and manuscript submission systems 
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journals should add a data availability statement to published articles and collect the necessary information through their submission systems.*
 :::
 
 [Templates](/docs/data_availability_statement/#templates-for-data-availability-statements) for [**data availability statements**](/docs/data_availability_statement) or a similarly termed section should also be added to the manuscript submission system. Once a template has been selected by the submitter, the data availability statement should be editable to allow authors to add additional information, such as what data are included in the dataset, similar to what is currently often mentioned in the section on supporting information PDF files. The submission system should then require the submitter to provide the necessary information, such as the DOI (specified as [DOI name](https://www.doi.org/doi-handbook/HTML/doi-name-syntax2.html) e.g. `10.1000/182` or as a URL i.e. including a resolver e.g. `https://doi.org/10.1000/182` ), repository name, third party name and contact information, or reasons for restricted access and information on how to access a dataset, depending on the template used.
 
-### Link Datasets to Articles in CrossRef DOI Metadata
+### Link datasets to articles in CrossRef DOI metadata
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journals should use the information available in data availability statements to enhance CrossRef DOI metadata by linking articles to datasets.*
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ In XML:
 <rel:program name="relations">
 	<rel:related_item>
 		<rel:description>
-		Dataset in <repository name>.		
+		Dataset in <<<repository name>>>.		
 		</rel:description>
 		<rel:inter_work_relation relationship-type="isSupplementedBy" 
 identifier-type="doi">10.prefix/suffix
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ identifier-type="doi">10.prefix/suffix
 
 In agreement with [Crossref's documentation on **linking datasets** to published items](https://www.crossref.org/documentation/schema-library/markup-guide-metadata-segments/relationships/), the relationship type `isSupplementedBy` should be used.
 
-### Add Data Publications to Prior Publication Policy
+### Add data publications to prior publication policy
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journal author guidelines should explicitly encourage pre-submission of datasets.*
@@ -63,21 +63,21 @@ Similar to the publication of preprints, journal author guidelines should allow
 A disadvantage of pre-submission is that researchers cannot link the dataset to the manuscript, as the manuscript has not yet been published and no DOI has been registered. The metadata of the dataset must then be manually updated by the authors after the article has been published. Datasets with status *under review* are one way to overcome this disadvantage (see below).
 :::
 
-### Recommendations to Include Research Data in the Review Process
+### Recommendations to include research data in the review process
 
 :::tip Standard
 *Journal author guidelines should explicitly encourage research data to be included in the review process.*
 :::
 
 Some repositories have an *under review* status alongside the *draft* and *published* statuses. A dataset *under review* is not editable and not yet published, i.e. it does not have a DOI registered. Therefore, the DOI cannot be validated. Nonetheless, the dataset has an internally reserved DOI and is accessible via a URL to provide access to editors and reviewers. This allows research data to be included in the review process. The URL to access the dataset should be requested by the submission system so that it can be forwarded to editors and reviewers.
 
-### Encourage Authors to Publish Datasets prior Publishing Articles
+### Encourage authors to publish datasets *under review* prior the articles gets published
 
 :::tip Standard
-*Journal author guidelines should require that datasets under review to be published prior to the publication of the associated article.*
+*Journal author guidelines should require that datasets with status under review to be published prior to the publication of the associated article.*
 :::
 
-To assist in automated workflows, such as linking the datasets to the published article through their respective PIDs, **datasets *under review* should be published prior to the publication of the article**. Once a manuscript has been accepted, the authors should be informed to publish their dataset *under review*. This ensures that the data has a registered DOI when the article gets published. Consequently, journals can run quality control checks on the provided DOI such as validation. This process must be explicitly communicated with authors through the author guidelines, yet, can also be included within other communication upon acceptance. Contemporaneous, the DOI for the article should be provided so that authors can include this information in their dataset's metadata prior to the publication of the dataset. Finally, the article is published, and its DOI is registered.
+To assist in automated workflows, such as linking the datasets to the published article through their respective PIDs, **datasets *under review* should be published before the article gets published**. Once a manuscript has been accepted, the authors should be informed to publish their dataset *under review*. This ensures that the data has a registered DOI when the article gets published. Consequently, journals can run quality control checks on the provided DOI such as validation. This process must be explicitly communicated with authors through the author guidelines, yet, can also be included within other communication upon acceptance. Contemporaneous, the DOI for the article should be provided so that authors can include this information in their dataset's metadata prior to the publication of the dataset. Finally, the article is published, and its DOI is registered.
 
 ### Scholix.org
 

docs/50_data_publication/70_publishing_standards/28_publishing_standards_intro.mdx

@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ id: "publishing_standards_intro"
 import N4CFeatures from '/src/components/N4CFeatures.js';
 
 :::info Info:
-Authors, academic publishers and research data infrastructure and resource providers are the target audiences for these standards.
+Authors, academic publishers and research data infrastructure providers are the target audiences for these standards.
 :::
 
-On this page we collect a non-exhaustive list of data publication standards, formulated as principles, that have been developed within the NFDI4Chem Publication Standards project. These standards are intended to implement the [FAIR Data Principles](/docs/fair/) with repect to data publication workflows. The main objective of these standards is to improve the quality of metadata and streamline publication workflows, including the manuscript peer-review process with corresponding datasets published in research data repositories. 
+On these pages we collect a non-exhaustive list of data publishing standards, formulated as principles, that have been developed within the NFDI4Chem Publication Standards project. These standards are intended to implement the [FAIR Data Principles](/docs/fair/) with respect to data publishing workflows. The main objective of these standards is to improve the quality of metadata and streamline publishing workflows, including the manuscript peer-review process with corresponding datasets published in research data repositories. 
 
-Click on a button below to get started with with standards for authors, academic publishers and infrastructure providers. These standards will be continously updated. 
+Click on a button below to get started with standards for authors, academic publishers and infrastructure providers. These standards will be continuously updated. 
 
 <N4CFeatures feature="stakeholders_data_publishing" />