Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEA] support spark.sql.legacy.timeParserPolicy when parsing CSV files #1111

Closed
andygrove opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4853
Closed

[FEA] support spark.sql.legacy.timeParserPolicy when parsing CSV files #1111

andygrove opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4853
Assignees
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@andygrove
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We should support spark.sql.legacy.timeParserPolicy when parsing CSV files

@andygrove andygrove added feature request New feature or request ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Nov 13, 2020
@andygrove andygrove added this to the Nov 9 - Nov 20 milestone Nov 13, 2020
@andygrove andygrove self-assigned this Nov 13, 2020
@andygrove andygrove removed this from the Nov 9 - Nov 20 milestone Nov 19, 2020
@sameerz sameerz removed the ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify label Nov 24, 2020
@sameerz
Copy link
Collaborator

sameerz commented Nov 24, 2020

Needs additional support for CSV parsing in cudf.

@andygrove andygrove removed their assignment Dec 14, 2020
@revans2 revans2 mentioned this issue Apr 1, 2021
38 tasks
@andygrove andygrove self-assigned this Feb 16, 2022
@andygrove andygrove added this to the Feb 14 - Feb 25 milestone Feb 16, 2022
tgravescs pushed a commit to tgravescs/spark-rapids that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
…IDIA#1111)

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <70000568+nvauto@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants