Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address feedback in "string anchors regexp replace" PR #5519

Conversation

andygrove
Copy link
Contributor

@andygrove andygrove commented May 17, 2022

This is a follow-on PR to #5491 to address some review feedback items.

Changes in this PR:

  • Change transpile return type so that first item in tuple is no longer an option
  • Replace many but not all uses of ._1 when processing result of calling transpile
  • Add an additional test

Signed-off-by: Andy Grove <andygrove@nvidia.com>
@andygrove andygrove force-pushed the string_anchors_regexp_replace-address-feedback branch from e7f99b3 to 1df80f1 Compare May 18, 2022 12:55
@andygrove andygrove changed the title WIP: Address feedback in "string anchors regexp replace" PR Address feedback in "string anchors regexp replace" PR May 18, 2022
@andygrove andygrove marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2022 12:56
@andygrove
Copy link
Contributor Author

@revans2 This PR addresses some of the issues you raised in #5491

@andygrove andygrove self-assigned this May 18, 2022
@andygrove andygrove added this to the May 2 - May 20 milestone May 18, 2022
@andygrove
Copy link
Contributor Author

build

@andygrove andygrove merged commit dbca151 into NVIDIA:branch-22.06 May 18, 2022
@andygrove andygrove deleted the string_anchors_regexp_replace-address-feedback branch May 18, 2022 16:58
@sameerz sameerz added the task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing label May 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants