Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move unit tests to separate directories, and document #8886

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

Ericson2314
Copy link
Member

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 commented Aug 30, 2023

Motivation

Today, with the tests inside a tests intermingled with the corresponding library's source code, we have a few problems:

  • We have to be careful that wildcards don't end up with tests being built as part of Nix proper, or test headers being installed as part of Nix proper.

  • Tests in libraries but not executables is not right:

    • It means each executable runs the previous unit tests again, because
      it needs the libraries.

    • It doesn't work right on Windows, which doesn't want you to load a DLL just for the side global variable . It could be made to work with the dlopen equivalent, but that's gross!

This reorg solves these problems.

There is a remaining problem which is that sibbling headers (like hash.hh the test header vs hash.hh the main libnixutil header) end up shadowing each other. This PR doesn't solve that. That is left as future work for a future PR.

Context

This does something more minimal than what #7876 asks for, but it is a step in the right direction.

Checklist for maintainers

Maintainers: tick if completed or explain if not relevant

  • agreed on idea
  • agreed on implementation strategy
  • tests, as appropriate
    • functional tests - tests/**.sh
    • unit tests - src/*/tests
    • integration tests - tests/nixos/*
  • documentation in the manual
  • documentation in the internal API docs
  • code and comments are self-explanatory
  • commit message explains why the change was made
  • new feature or incompatible change: updated release notes

Priorities

Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the with-tests Issues related to testing. PRs with tests have some priority label Aug 30, 2023
@Ericson2314
Copy link
Member Author

I should add that the way things are today was quite concerning to @p01arst0rm when working on the Meson fork.

@p01arst0rm
Copy link
Contributor

good PR 👍

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 force-pushed the flatten-tests branch 2 times, most recently from f5d40b0 to 83d0e79 Compare September 2, 2023 18:31
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 changed the title Move tests to separate directories, and document Move unit tests to separate directories, and document Oct 6, 2023
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 force-pushed the flatten-tests branch 3 times, most recently from ad98a09 to 5705c8d Compare October 9, 2023 21:55
@fricklerhandwerk
Copy link
Contributor

fricklerhandwerk commented Nov 13, 2023

Discussed in Nix team meeting:

  • moving the nested tests -> test produces somewhat unnecessary diff
  • @thufschmitt: is there any cost to nesting all of that under a top-level tests directory?
  • @edolstra: It isn't so nice that foo.cc (of tests) is no longer next to tests/foo.cc
    • @Ericson2314: Can move inside tests dir
    • But we do need the inner test dir
    • @edolstra why is that?
    • @Ericson2314: Lack of -I tests=... like Nix has in the C/C++ compiler
  • assigned to @thufschmitt

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-11-13-nix-team-meeting-minutes-103/35400/1

@Ericson2314
Copy link
Member Author

Somewhat surprisingly, this has become relevant for the Windows work (I need to separate the test exes and tests libraries better, tests/foo.cc for lib vs foo.cc will do the trick).

Let me know if this looks good to you, @thufschmitt. (The conflicts are usually extremely superficial and easy to fix.)

Copy link
Member

@thufschmitt thufschmitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of small things in the testing manual, but looks good otherwise.

Feel free to merge once it's addressed (or discarded, I don't feel too strongly about these)

doc/manual/src/contributing/testing.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 76 to 95
### Rationale

The use of a separate directory for the unit tests might seem inconvenient, as the tests are not "right next to" the part of the code they are testing.
But organizing the tests this way has one big benefit:
there is no risk of any build-system wildcards for the library accidentally picking up test code that shoud not built and installed as part of the library.

Likewise, the use of the `test/` subdir might seem superfluous:
Isn't the point of the `*-test` subdir to indicate that these files are tests?
Why do we need another `test` subdirectory?
The answer is that we need to be able to tell apart the two headers, and make sure we include the right one.
For `.cc` files, this is matter of doing `#include "foo.hh"` vs `#include "tests/foo.hh`
For `.hh` files, this is a bit more subtle, because a `#include "foo.hh` instead `test/foo.hh` will end up including itself because `#include "..."`
[always prioritizes files in the same directory](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html#tag_20_11_04), rather than the original header from the library.
Instead, use `#include <foo.hh>` to get the original library header, and `#include "tests/foo.hh"` to get the test header.

Why do we have test headers at all?
These are usually for [rapidcheck]'s `Arbitrary` machinery, which is used to describe how to generate values of a given type for the sake of running property tests.
Because types contain other types, `Arbitrary` "instances" for some type are not just useful for testing that type, but also any other type that contains it.
Indeed, if we don't reuse the upstream type's `Arbitrary` instance, the downstream type's `Arbitrary` instance would become much more complex and hard to understand.
In order to reuse these instances, we therefore declare them in these testing headers.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is don't think we care a bout that at all here. This is nice for a commit message, but users/contributors generally shouldn't be really concerned about it, and wouldn't read it any way.

Copy link
Contributor

@fricklerhandwerk fricklerhandwerk Nov 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's the generally he right place for this kind of contextual information, but we may consider moving that out of the manual and into the tree. (At some point in the future, that is.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want contributors to also write property tests and "Arbitrary instances", so I do want that pattern to be documented.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amid many other changes this text is now reorganized out of the file layout section. Hope that is better.

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 force-pushed the flatten-tests branch 2 times, most recently from c10b7c7 to ee03d39 Compare November 24, 2023 04:53
@Ericson2314
Copy link
Member Author

@thufschmitt I am embarrassed to say that my "I'll just fix conflicts after" was wrong, so I think this needs to be re-reviewed.

Here is what happened:

  • I realized putting the source files also in tests defeated one of the purposes purpose of the original PR, which is to make sure that #include "foo.h" without test/ unambiguously refereed to the original library header, and not the test header. Nevertheless, I kept the companions to test headers in test --- i.e. the PR does the thing we agreed on the meeting despite these issues and instead no longer attempts to address this ambiguous #include problem.

  • I better separate the "test libs" with headers and arbitrary instances from the tests themselves without headers:

    • libraries get their own test/unit/*-lib dir.
    • Now most tests .cc files do not need to go in tests/ because they don't correspond to a header
    • This fixes running the unit tests on windows, where it doesn't want to load a separate DLL just for the side effects.
  • unit test data dirs are not longer a separate hierarchy, as avoiding "cumulative" test exes means we don't need a single root data dir.

So one problem is no longer solved in the name of concensus, but another problem is solved (the windows problem), so this PR is hopefully still just as net useful.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2023-11-27-nix-team-meeting-minutes-107/36112/1

@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 force-pushed the flatten-tests branch 3 times, most recently from 10f8db7 to 0f54ece Compare December 1, 2023 14:33
Copy link
Member

@roberth roberth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts:

  • This moves from functional grouping to technical group, which is a small regression in DX, but that's something because meson requires it anyway, and meson will fix more important issues
  • Significant churn. @Ericson2314 commits to backporting and helping out with PR rebasing.
  • Fixes issues as described

Conclusion: net positive

Today, with the tests inside a `tests` intermingled with the
corresponding library's source code, we have a few problems:

- We have to be careful that wildcards don't end up with tests being
  built as part of Nix proper, or test headers being installed as part
  of Nix proper.

- Tests in libraries but not executables is not right:

  - It means each executable runs the previous unit tests again, because
    it needs the libraries.

  - It doesn't work right on Windows, which doesn't want you to load a
    DLL just for the side global variable . It could be made to work
    with the dlopen equivalent, but that's gross!

This reorg solves these problems.

There is a remaining problem which is that sibbling headers (like
`hash.hh` the test header vs `hash.hh` the main `libnixutil` header) end
up shadowing each other. This PR doesn't solve that. That is left as
future work for a future PR.

Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
@roberth roberth merged commit 84fe429 into NixOS:master Dec 1, 2023
8 checks passed
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 deleted the flatten-tests branch December 1, 2023 16:15
@Ericson2314 Ericson2314 added backport 2.18-maintenance Automatically creates a PR against the branch backport 2.19-maintenance Automatically creates a PR against the branch labels Dec 1, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2023

Backport failed for 2.18-maintenance, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin 2.18-maintenance
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance origin/2.18-maintenance
cd .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance
git switch --create backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance
git cherry-pick -x 91b6833686a6a6d9eac7f3f66393ec89ef1d3b57

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2023

Backport failed for 2.19-maintenance, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin 2.19-maintenance
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance origin/2.19-maintenance
cd .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance
git switch --create backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance
git cherry-pick -x 91b6833686a6a6d9eac7f3f66393ec89ef1d3b57

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2023

Backport failed for 2.18-maintenance, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin 2.18-maintenance
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance origin/2.18-maintenance
cd .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance
git switch --create backport-8886-to-2.18-maintenance
git cherry-pick -x 91b6833686a6a6d9eac7f3f66393ec89ef1d3b57

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2023

Backport failed for 2.19-maintenance, because it was unable to cherry-pick the commit(s).

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin 2.19-maintenance
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance origin/2.19-maintenance
cd .worktree/backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance
git switch --create backport-8886-to-2.19-maintenance
git cherry-pick -x 91b6833686a6a6d9eac7f3f66393ec89ef1d3b57

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.18-maintenance Automatically creates a PR against the branch backport 2.19-maintenance Automatically creates a PR against the branch with-tests Issues related to testing. PRs with tests have some priority
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants