[16.0][MIG] migrate pos_tare to 16.0 #1224
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ADD] barcode nomenclature for tare [ADD] tare field on pos.order.line model [ADD] Tare button in PoS numpad [IMP] handle correctly different UoM [IMP] add warning at checkout if qty <=0 [IMP] display gross and tare weight for each line Co-authored-by: François Kawala <francois.kawala@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sylvain LE GAL <sylvain.legal@grap.coop>
Currently translated at 100.0% (46 of 46 strings) Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/es/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/
…antity in the correct place
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/
Currently translated at 100.0% (55 of 55 strings) Translation: pos-12.0/pos-12.0-pos_tare Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/pos-12-0/pos-12-0-pos_tare/it/
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a first pass at the migration from version 12 through 14 (#1206 ).
I'm having trouble testing the barcode behavior, how do you find out the check digit for an encoded tare barcode ?
Refactoring suggestion
The parameter
iface_gross_weight_methodlets you choose wether to input gross weight manually (manual) or through the scale (scale).manualis selected andiface_electronic_scaleis false : you can enter the weight and tare through the numpad widgetmanualis selected andiface_electronic_scaleis true : scale screen opens and you can input weight manually in the screen. The scale will never be read. => why open the scale screen if the scale is not read and everything can be done through the product screenscaleis selected andiface_electronic_scaleis false : the scale screen does not open and you can input the weight and tare through the widget => this seems inconsistent to mescaleis selected andiface_electronic_scaleis true : the scale screen opens, the scale is read.I want to remove the
iface_gross_weight_methodaltogether to simplify the configuration and the code. @legalsylvain what do you think about it ?