-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/enhance configuration #630
Fix/enhance configuration #630
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks.
@@ -52,6 +53,19 @@ handlers=consoleHandler | |||
#handlers=fileHandler | |||
#qualname=ocrd.workspace | |||
|
|||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PIL restriction from the builtin config omitted because it is INFO
anyway, correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since it is the default level. But If you mind, I can add this as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall ocrd
be integrated, too?
Be aware, this might have side-effects, because it is the far most top ocrd logging channel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall
ocrd
be integrated, too?
Be aware, this might have side-effects, because it is the far most top ocrd logging channel.
Since we don't specify logging behavior for ocrd*
in the builtin config, we should not in the config file.
I also would leave the [logger_ocrd_workspace]
commented out as an example - setting this to DEBUG
by default will be very verbose.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense, I adopt your suggestions asap
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #630 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.82% 84.89% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 52 52
Lines 2952 2952
Branches 575 575
==========================================
+ Hits 2504 2506 +2
+ Misses 334 332 -2
Partials 114 114
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Some draft regarding #621