Tables 26 27: SBE61_V5.0.9 DSB301-10-C85 QUARTZDYNE sensors

[tcarval]

SBE61_V5.0.9 sensor model
The SBE61_V5.0.9 sensor model is currently rejected.
On December 10th 2021 it was added in the SENSOR_MODEL table 27

QUARTZDYNE sensor maker
The QUARTZDYNE sensor maker is currently rejected.
On December 10th 2021 it was added in the SENSOR_MAKER table 26

DSB301-10-C85 sensor model
The DSB301-10-C85 sensor model is rejected
Please use "QUARTZDYNE_DSB301-10-C85" from SENSOR_MODEL table 27

See also #127

Dac: 'aoml'
File: 'sio_20211110181548.tar.gz:::5906433_meta.nc'
Type: 'META-DATA'
Version: '3.1'
PI Name: 'NATHALIE ZILBERMAN'
Current Time (UCT): Wed Nov 10 19:45:11 2021
Reason:
SENSOR_MODEL[2]: 'SBE61_V5.0.9' Status: Invalid
SENSOR_MODEL[3]: 'SBE61_V5.0.9' Status: Invalid
SENSOR_MAKER[4]: 'QUARTZDYNE' Status: Invalid
SENSOR_MODEL[4]: 'DSB301-10-C85' Status: Invalid

[ClaudiaAOML]

QUARTZDYNE_DSB301-10-C85 as well as DSB301-10-C85 are currently rejected by the format checker.

Based on discussion during ADMT22 (should manufacturer be part of sensor model; my understanding is: we will use as sensor model what the manufacturer uses and not revise it by adding the manufacturer): I think it will have to be DSB301-10-C85, but I'm not sure.

[tcarval]

This action was complete in December 2021

[tcarval]

The MENSOR sensor maker was missing in reference table 26. It is now registered.

ref_table-26:MENSOR | MENSOR | A manufacturing company located in San Marcos, Texas (United States of America), specialised in precision pressure products. | 22/10/2023 | added by T. Carval for SOLO