"Save result" is misleading

[christophfriedrich]

The summary of save_result is "Save processed data to storage". This can be misleading to users who start synchronous jobs to "just have a look": They don't actually want to save something, especially not to storage -- they just want to output it.

Considering the above use case of "just a look", it's not obvious that you always need this process to actually get results from any process graph.

Looking back it might've been smarter to call this process something like output, but I guess for changing the name (especially of such a central process) it's a bit too late now :D

[m-mohr]

Indeed, I'll try to generalize this to also work better with sync. jobs and also web services.