Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove qiskit.org links #815

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano added the backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or important enough to be port to stable label Feb 12, 2024
@@ -202,12 +202,6 @@ notes will look like for the current state of the repo you can run:
and the release notes in particular will be located at
`docs/_build/html/release_notes.html`

## Installing Qiskit IBM Provider from source
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These docs don't exist anymore. Since this repo is going away, probably not worth adding a replacement.

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ def backends(
IBMProvider.backends(open_pulse=True)

For the full list of backend attributes, see the `IBMBackend` class documentation
<https://qiskit.org/documentation/apidoc/providers_models.html>
<https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/api/qiskit/providers_models>
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no IBMBackend class in the Qiskit docs. I'm not sure if this should link to something else?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Link looks good

@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ def backends(
IBMProvider.backends(open_pulse=True)

For the full list of backend attributes, see the `IBMBackend` class documentation
<https://qiskit.org/documentation/apidoc/providers_models.html>
<https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/api/qiskit/providers_models>
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto about IBMBackend not existing.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7877104213

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 43.323%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7818785556: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2933
Relevant Lines: 6770

💛 - Coveralls

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano merged commit 2d3cfe1 into Qiskit:main Feb 12, 2024
19 checks passed
Eric-Arellano added a commit to Eric-Arellano/qiskit-ibm-provider that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
kt474 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or important enough to be port to stable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants