-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rbuf: does not remove oldest entry if we have entry for current fragment #4771
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Yonezawa-T2
added
Type: enhancement
The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation
Area: network
Area: Networking
State: waiting for other PR
State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first
labels
Feb 9, 2016
This PR should be able to be independent from #4770 |
Yonezawa-T2
force-pushed
the
rbuf_gc_improvement
branch
4 times, most recently
from
February 9, 2016 11:32
cec3ba6
to
561185c
Compare
Yonezawa-T2
force-pushed
the
rbuf_gc_improvement
branch
from
February 18, 2016 01:48
561185c
to
9548cf5
Compare
Rebased. Now independent from #4770. |
@authmillenon, did you find time to review? |
OlegHahm
added
the
Community: Hack'n'ACK candidate
This PR is a candidate for review and discussion during one of RIOT's monthly Hack'n'ACK parties
label
Feb 27, 2016
Will use the Hack'n'ACK for that. |
I actually DID review it yesterday but somehow forgot to comment: Looks good code-wise, but I'm not sure how to test. :-) |
(I guess if fragmentation is still working we are fine, will test so) |
miri64
added
CI: needs squashing
Commits in this PR need to be squashed; If set, CI systems will mark this PR as unmergable
and removed
State: waiting for other PR
State: The PR requires another PR to be merged first
labels
Mar 2, 2016
Reassembly still works: ACK. Please squash. |
miri64
added
the
CI: ready for build
If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR
label
Mar 2, 2016
If all rbuf slots are in use, `_rbuf_gc` removes the oldest entry even if the entry for the current fragment exists. This effectively decreases usable slots by one. This patch makes `_rbuf_gc` removes the oldest entry only if there is no entry for the current fragment.
Yonezawa-T2
force-pushed
the
rbuf_gc_improvement
branch
from
March 3, 2016 02:20
9548cf5
to
31fa340
Compare
Squashed. |
OlegHahm
removed
the
CI: needs squashing
Commits in this PR need to be squashed; If set, CI systems will mark this PR as unmergable
label
Mar 3, 2016
miri64
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2016
rbuf: does not remove oldest entry if we have entry for current fragment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: network
Area: Networking
CI: ready for build
If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR
Community: Hack'n'ACK candidate
This PR is a candidate for review and discussion during one of RIOT's monthly Hack'n'ACK parties
Type: enhancement
The issue suggests enhanceable parts / The PR enhances parts of the codebase / documentation
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If all rbuf slots are in use,
_rbuf_gc
removes the oldest entry even if the entry for the current fragment exists. This effectively decreases usable slots by one. This patch makes_rbuf_gc
removes the oldest entry only if there is no entry for the current fragment.Depends on #4770.
This is a remainder of #4547.