feat(config): sw-1692 activate rhel for x86 EUS

[vbusch]

What's included

feat(config): sw-1692 activate rhel for x86 EUS

Notes

Sorting automatically makes x86 EUS appear in the list

How to test

Coverage and basic unit test check

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn test
3. confirm tests come back clean

Proxy run check

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. make sure Docker is running, plus on network, then
3. $ yarn start:proxy
4. confirm the product

• appears in the variant list for RHEL
• confirm ALL API calls now include the product ID rhel-for-x86-eus

Check the build

1. update the NPM packages with $ yarn
2. $ yarn build
3. confirm tests come back clean

Example

Updates issue/story

sw-1692

related #1213

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1216 (77142c1) into main (1a675ac) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1216   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.35%   92.35%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines        4198     4198           
  Branches     1753     1753           
=======================================
  Hits         3877     3877           
  Misses        302      302           
  Partials       19       19           

Files	Coverage Δ
src/services/rhsm/rhsmConstants.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a675ac...77142c1. Read the comment docs.

[cdcabrera]

Minor changes to align the product identifier. Looks like you may also need to run the documentation generator

$ yarn build:docs

... and add the result to your commit. At some point we'll look at getting that added on merge without the need for human

[vbusch]

/retest

Error: EMFILE: too many open files, open '/container_workspace/package.json'

Locally yarn test:deps is passing for me

[vbusch]

/retest

[cdcabrera]

Really close, just learning the diffs between tools =)

[cdcabrera]

@vbusch everything is brought up to date and passing and passing review!

We're investigating an unrelated build issue around the charts before this merges. Once that issue is tracked down we'll look at hitting approve for confirmation