Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use process worker nuget package #3

Open
2 tasks
Phil91 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

Use process worker nuget package #3

Phil91 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Phil91
Copy link
Collaborator

Phil91 commented Apr 9, 2024

Description

To reduce code complexity and maintenance of code the application should use the ProcessWorker Nuget package provided by the portal-backend.

Acceptance Criteria

  • removal of the existing unneeded code
  • nuget package for the process worker is installed and used

Additional Information

This task can only be startet after: #240 is implemented and merged.
@Phil91 Phil91 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 9, 2024
Phil91 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
@dependabot
chore(deps): bump actions/cache from 3 to 4 (#3)
34341e6 
Bumps [actions/cache](https://github.com/actions/cache) from 3 to 4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/cache/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/main/RELEASES.md)
- [Commits](actions/cache@v3...v4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/cache
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Phil91