-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create an alias get_element_class_name to use it in blocks #44099
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ const blockViewRegex = new RegExp( | |
const prefixFunctions = [ | ||
'build_query_vars_from_query_block', | ||
'wp_enqueue_block_support_styles', | ||
'wp_theme_element_class_name', | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would be happier if we wouldn't have to list those functions here. What's the reasoning behind using the function name with There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That was my suggestion. I probably applied the conclusion from #43779 (comment) and the naming collision too strongly. Since we're not dealing with a different version of the same function (as was the case in #43779, which was then superseded by #43859), it's probably fine to name it There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Aside: @mtias has pointed out to me in Slack that
-- which was basically the situation we had in #43859. As we've discussed above, this doesn't currently apply to We should probably put some guidelines into writing -- there currently seems to be a bit of confusion around what strategies to apply to avoid collisions (see e.g. #44100). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There are guidelines present in the documentation: Feel free to add more details, so it makes the process less confusing. I think there is rarely a reason to use the trick with webpack and |
||
]; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really sure if this case can happen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we use that in other places. The class and the method are present in the Gutenberg plugin so I belive you can skip the check.