Sentiments-Analysis-on-Amazon-Fine-Food-Reviews-Dataset

This project contains the code for Sentiments Analysis applied on the Amazon Fine Food Reviews Dataset. The model facilitates classification of a Food review into a positive or a negative review.

Dataset

Amazon Fine Food Reviews dataset is used. The dataset contains 568,454 food reviews Amazon users left up to October 2012.

Preprocessing

All NLP models require text preprocessing. In this model also, a lot of preprocessing is applied on the text.

First all of the text is converted into lowercase. Then all HTML tags are removed.

After that all special characters are removed and only letters of English Alphabet (a-z), digits (0-9) and full stop (.) are kept.

All stop words( the, and, of etc.) are also removed from the text.

The words are then Lemmatized (i.e. to convert the word into its base or dictionary form. e.g. studying to study).

When the dataset was pictorially represented, it was discovered that more than 70% of the dataset contains less than 60 words. So, 60 was set as an upper limit for a review to be considered in the training data ie. all reviews with length greater than 60 words were rejected by the model.

Then the dataset was split into TRAIN-VALIDATION-TEST in the ratio of 60:20:20.

Then the dataset was Tokenized i.e. words were converted to corresponding indices. The reviews with length less than 60 were padded with zeroes so as to have a consistent length of 60 for all reviews.

Models

Four models were used for training :

1. Custom Embedding Model : In this model, the Custom Word Embeddings Layer is used as the first layer in the model i.e. no pre-trained embeddings were used. Instead, the model learnt the word embeddings for the first layer on its own.

Training Accuracy - 99.14%
Validation Accuracy - 94.86%
Test Accuracy - 94.92%

2. Word2Vec Model : In this model, the Word Embeddings were first learnt using the Gensim Word2Vec model. After the embeddings were learnt, they were given as fixed untrainable input to the model as the first layer.

Training Accuracy - 93.21%
Validation Accuracy - 93.72%
Test Accuracy - 93.89%

3. Averaging Model : In this model, pre-trained 100-dimensional GloVe Embeddings (i.e. glove.6B.100d) were used. For each word in the review, the corresponding GloVe word embedding was extracted which was then averaged out for the whole review. The final averaged embedding was then used as an input to the model. This model did not take into account the relative positioning of words as they were just being averaged out.

Training Accuracy - 90.27%
Validation Accuracy - 89.42%
Test Accuracy - 89.38%

4. GloVe Model : This model is exactly similiar to the 2nd model except for the difference that fixed pre-trained untrainable 100-dimensional GloVe Embeddings (i.e. glove.6B.100d) were used instead of Word2Vec embeddings.

Training Accuracy - 92.92%
Validation Accuracy - 93.38%
Test Accuracy - 93.13%

The First and Second Model are implemented in sentiments_analysis_amazon_fine_food_reviews_custom_embedding_and_word2vec.ipynb file.

The Third and Fourth Model are implemented in sentiments_analysis_amazon_fine_food_reviews_glove_embedding.ipynb file.

Model Performances

The first model i.e. Custom Embeddings Model clearly outperfomed all other models and stood first with the Test Set Accuracy of 94.92%.

Word2Vec Model has second best Test Set accuracy of 93.89% and GloVe Embeddings Model stood third with 93.13% accuracy.

The Averaging Model has worst Test accuracy out of all the models i.e. 89.38% which was fairly intuitive as the model was pretty basic in the sense that it was not considering the relative positioning of words in the reviews.

Sample Classifications

This is how the best model out of all four i.e. Custom Embeddings Model classified the following self-written reviews :

1. "The taste of the biscuits was quite spectacular. It seemed as if it was taken straight from heaven"
   

   Result : Positive with 99.64% surity

2. "Peanuts were too salty according to my taste"
   

   Result : Negative with 99.84% surity

3. "Food was unhygienic. I fell ill after eating"
   

   Result : Negative with 96.88% surity

4. "I am sure I liked what i had"
   

   Result : Positive with 66.48% surity

5. "I am not sure I liked what i had"
   

   Result : Negative with 99.47% surity

6. "If you are looking for a secret ingredient, go for it"
   

   Result : Positive with 88.35% surity

7. "When i first bought this, i was confused about its quality and taste. But after eating this, my children fell in love with me. Thanks!!"
   

   Result : Positive with 99.54% surity

8. "If you are looking for a quality food, dr. oetkers product always seem to be my first choice"
   Result : Positive with 94.34% surity

9. "I'm not really a tea drinker but my husband is and he loves this tea. So on his behalf I'm recommending it. Just go on with my hubby's recommendation."
   

   Result : Positive with 96.55% surity