Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add global Vulnerability list #95 #171

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Add global Vulnerability list #95 #171

merged 16 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

tdruez
Copy link
Contributor

@tdruez tdruez commented Aug 23, 2024

In the context of #95

This PR introduces a new "Vulnerability" list view, available from the "Tools" menu when enable_vulnerablecodedb_access is enabled.

The overall goal is to rank and prioritize package vulnerabilities.

The current implementation focuses on ranking/sorting: Vulnerabilities can be sorted and filtered by severity score. It's also possible to sort by the count of affected packages to help prioritize.
The current progress is about displaying the data collected from VulnerableCode.

@pombredanne @DennisClark I now need your input on how we want to implement the "prioritize" layer, ie: data entered by DejaCode users, specific to a Dataspace.
New fields? Status, priority? What are the actions a user can do about one or a selection of Vulnerabilities? And the consequences of those actions on the Vulnerability behavior in the UI. Let's make sure those new fields are aligned with the output format we plan to support (CycloneDX VEX etc..)

Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
@DennisClark
Copy link
Contributor

@tdruez @pombredanne Prioritization of Vulnerabilities in DejaCode depends on the implementation of these things:

VCIO: Calculate vulnerability risk
aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode#1543

DejaCode: Vulnerabilities policy
#97

I think that those items are the most practical way to support a prioritization process in DejaCode.
We probably need to accelerate development of the calculation of vulnerability risk in VCIO.

@DennisClark
Copy link
Contributor

@tdruez @pombredanne the new Vulnerabilities option from the Tools dropdown menu works quite well, and the performance is surprisingly fast. I think it is probably ready to deploy.

Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
@tdruez tdruez merged commit ada0091 into main Aug 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@tdruez tdruez deleted the 95-vulnerability-ui branch August 27, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants