Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: exclude sampleRUM from coverage #5

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 13, 2023
Merged

chore: exclude sampleRUM from coverage #5

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 13, 2023

Conversation

kptdobe
Copy link
Contributor

@kptdobe kptdobe commented Sep 12, 2023

WIP - sampleRUM first basic test

@trieloff I am not sure on how to test all sampleRUM capabilities and features. It would be great if you could write tests to reach 100% of coverage (currently 71%).
Note that the change to web-test-runner.config.js has to be reverted once 100% is hit. Testing only the rum code is the easiest solution I have found to know the current coverage on the rum area.

@kptdobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

kptdobe commented Sep 12, 2023

Oh, I just saw #2 - maybe the code will even go away, thus no test required in this repo.

@chicharr @trieloff ... ?

@trieloff
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the test. We should pull this into helix-rum-js

@kptdobe kptdobe changed the title chore: sampleRUM test chore: exclude sampleRUM from coverage Sep 13, 2023
@kptdobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

kptdobe commented Sep 13, 2023

Ok, I have updated the PR to exclude rum.js from coverage since the code will come from https://github.com/adobe/helix-rum-js (tracked in #2). I have also created a draft PR to initiate the testing work on sampleRUM in remote repo (see adobe/helix-rum-js#93).

@kptdobe kptdobe merged commit d086a37 into main Sep 13, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@kptdobe kptdobe deleted the rum-test branch September 13, 2023 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants