Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dotnet] speed up tests; rename runtime dll ready for nuget #1845

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 12, 2017

Conversation

xied75
Copy link
Contributor

@xied75 xied75 commented Apr 28, 2017

@parrt @ericvergnaud https://travis-ci.org/xied75/antlr4/builds/226855441

Renamed dll to Antlr4.Runtime.Core as Eric suggested.

dotnet test on Mac now able to finish successfully.

dotnet test on Linux runs faster.

The cmd to pack nuget package is dotnet pack Antlr4.Runtime.dotnet.csproj then we'll get a nupkg inside bin/

In fact we can push the nupkg automatically (nightly build would be great) if we want. Let me know.

@ericvergnaud
Copy link
Contributor

ericvergnaud commented Apr 28, 2017 via email

@xied75
Copy link
Contributor Author

xied75 commented May 2, 2017

That PR build could be a one-off, I've restarted my pull run 3 times, all finished much faster.

@ericvergnaud
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, seems to work when re-running it manually.
So I support moving on.
@parrt not sure we want to bump the version in Antlr4.Runtime.dotnet.csproj i.e. the runtime itself is pretty much the same, only the build/test is changed.
I will provide Nuget stuff in a separate PR once this one is merged.

@parrt parrt added this to the 4.7.1 milestone May 12, 2017
@parrt parrt merged commit c1663e7 into antlr:master May 12, 2017
@xied75
Copy link
Contributor Author

xied75 commented May 18, 2017

ping @ericvergnaud would be great to have your follow up PR so that this finally makes it to the NuGet source. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants