GH-44222: [C++][Gandiva] Accept LLVM 19.1

[kou]

Rationale for this change

LLVM 19.1.0 was released.

What changes are included in this PR?

Accept LLVM 19.1.0.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

• GitHub Issue: [C++][Gandiva] Add support for LLVM 19.1.0 #44222

[kou]

@github-actions crossbow submit -g cpp

[github-actions]

⚠️ GitHub issue #44222 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

[github-actions]

Revision: 96be329

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b5508a5d51

Task	Status
example-cpp-minimal-build-static
example-cpp-minimal-build-static-system-dependency
example-cpp-tutorial
test-alpine-linux-cpp
test-build-cpp-fuzz
test-conda-cpp
test-conda-cpp-valgrind
test-cuda-cpp-ubuntu-20.04-cuda-11.2.2
test-cuda-cpp-ubuntu-22.04-cuda-11.7.1
test-debian-12-cpp-amd64
test-debian-12-cpp-i386
test-fedora-39-cpp
test-ubuntu-20.04-cpp
test-ubuntu-20.04-cpp-bundled
test-ubuntu-20.04-cpp-minimal-with-formats
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-20
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-emscripten
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-no-threading
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-gcc-13-bundled
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-gcc-14
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-thread-sanitizer

[kou]

@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars

[github-actions]

Revision: 96be329

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-88a671c085

Task	Status
java-jars

[kou]

+1

AppVeyor failure is GH-44234.

[vibhatha]

@kou I recently disabled some tests in Gandiva because of the issue mentioned here #43981

Do you think re-enabling and testing would be a feasible idea with this change?

cc @lidavidm

[lidavidm]

@kou I recently disabled some tests in Gandiva because of the issue mentioned here #43981

Do you think re-enabling and testing would be a feasible idea with this change?

cc @lidavidm

Let's just leave it IMO, I hope the Gandiva maintainers can step back up to reenable the tests

[kou]

We can work on re-enabling them as a separated PR.
This can fix existing CI failures.

I'll merge this.

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 3505457.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 6 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.