-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-44234: [CI][C++][AppVeyor] Use conda instead of Mamba #44235
Conversation
|
dc79743
to
b508284
Compare
Using Mamba 1.5.10 (that was worked recently) again: Failed: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/arrow/builds/50678962#L283
|
Using Mamba 2.0.0 with cache clear: Failed: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/arrow/builds/50679328#L306
|
Using conda with conda-libmamba-solver 2.0.0: Failed: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/arrow/builds/50679652#L296
|
Passed with "classic" solver. |
Package install time is slower: 00:05:38 -> Before: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/arrow/builds/50676183?fullLog=true#L748 After: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/arrow/builds/50679973?fullLog=true#L920 This is slower but let's merge this to fix CI failures. We may migrate to GitHub from AppVeyor: #42137 |
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 96d61c7. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 10 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Rationale for this change
mamba update
with Mamba 2.0.0 failed.What changes are included in this PR?
Use conda instead of Mamba. "conda-libmamba-solver" isn't used too. "classic" solver is used.
Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
mamba update
failed #44234