Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI Problem] tests/scripts/pytest_wrapper.py:134 ERROR object of type 'NoneType' has no len() #11544

Closed
areusch opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #11553
Closed

Comments

@areusch
Copy link
Contributor

areusch commented Jun 2, 2022

Seeing

[2022-06-02T02:51:11.575Z] [tests/scripts/pytest_wrapper.py:134 ERROR] object of type 'NoneType' has no len()

at the end of the log.

Branch/PR Failing

#11464

Jenkins Link

https://ci.tlcpack.ai/blue/rest/organizations/jenkins/pipelines/tvm/branches/PR-11464/runs/7/nodes/373/steps/1123/log/?start=0

Flakiness

unclear

@areusch areusch changed the title [CI Problem] [CI Problem] tests/scripts/pytest_wrapper.py:134 ERROR object of type 'NoneType' has no len() Jun 2, 2022
driazati added a commit to driazati/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)
driazati added a commit to driazati/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)
driazati added a commit to driazati/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)
driazati added a commit to driazati/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)
areusch pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
This should fix #11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Kathryn-cat pushed a commit to Kathryn-cat/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
juda pushed a commit to juda/tvm that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2022
This should fix apache#11544 and adds some more logging in case the issue persists. Unfortunately it is difficult to test for real since the case data in that PR is thrown away after Jenkins is done (Jenkins does store test data but it marshals JUnits into its own format)

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant