[ci] Test image update #11296
Closed
[ci] Test image update #11296
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lunderberg
added a commit
to Lunderberg/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2022
This has previously been implemented for `Schedule.transform_layout` in apache#11296, extending to allow for block arguments in all `Schedule` methods. This change was only made for arguments that must be a `BlockRV`. For arguments that may be either a `BlockRV` or another type (e.g. `Schedule.get_child_blocks` accepts either `BlockRV` or `LoopRV`), this sugar is not implemented, to avoid ambiguity.
vinx13
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2022
…11624) * [Schedule] Allowed string argument as block arg This has previously been implemented for `Schedule.transform_layout` in #11296, extending to allow for block arguments in all `Schedule` methods. This change was only made for arguments that must be a `BlockRV`. For arguments that may be either a `BlockRV` or another type (e.g. `Schedule.get_child_blocks` accepts either `BlockRV` or `LoopRV`), this sugar is not implemented, to avoid ambiguity. * [Schedule] Allowed string argument to Schedule.reindex Similar to #11269, which added this functionality to `Schedule.transform_layout`. * CI test update
Kathryn-cat
pushed a commit
to Kathryn-cat/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2022
…pache#11624) * [Schedule] Allowed string argument as block arg This has previously been implemented for `Schedule.transform_layout` in apache#11296, extending to allow for block arguments in all `Schedule` methods. This change was only made for arguments that must be a `BlockRV`. For arguments that may be either a `BlockRV` or another type (e.g. `Schedule.get_child_blocks` accepts either `BlockRV` or `LoopRV`), this sugar is not implemented, to avoid ambiguity. * [Schedule] Allowed string argument to Schedule.reindex Similar to apache#11269, which added this functionality to `Schedule.transform_layout`. * CI test update
juda
pushed a commit
to juda/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2022
…pache#11624) * [Schedule] Allowed string argument as block arg This has previously been implemented for `Schedule.transform_layout` in apache#11296, extending to allow for block arguments in all `Schedule` methods. This change was only made for arguments that must be a `BlockRV`. For arguments that may be either a `BlockRV` or another type (e.g. `Schedule.get_child_blocks` accepts either `BlockRV` or `LoopRV`), this sugar is not implemented, to avoid ambiguity. * [Schedule] Allowed string argument to Schedule.reindex Similar to apache#11269, which added this functionality to `Schedule.transform_layout`. * CI test update
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to guideline https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. After the pull request is submitted, please request code reviews from Reviewers by @ them in the pull request thread.