- A Maven plugin that generates dependency graphs
This Maven plugin generates dependency graphs on single modules or in an aggregated form on multi-module projects. The graphs are represented by .dot
files. In case that Graphviz is installed on the machine where this plugin is run, the .dot
file can be directly converted into all supported image files.
For more information take a look at the generated plugin page.
The depgraph-maven-plugin is available on Maven Central. So no further repository configuration is required.
These are the plugin coordinates:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.ferstl</groupId>
<artifactId>depgraph-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0.4</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
- Version 1.0.4
- Version 1.0.3
- Version 1.0.2
- Version 1.0.1
- Version 1.0.0 (first version)
All examples are based on a multi-module project with the following structure:
parent
- module-1
- module-2
- sub-parent
- module-3
Each of the modules contains some dependencies in different scopes.
A simple graph can be created by executing the depgraph:graph
goal:
The goal can be configured to show the versions and/or groupIds on the dependencies:
With versions
With groupIds
The depgraph:graph
goal can be configured to show duplicate and/or conflicting versions. Duplicate versions are shown as dotted black arrows. Conflicting versions are shown as dashed red arrows:
Duplicate dependencies do occur when more than one module defines the same dependency, which is not a problem. Maven's dependency resolution will just pick one dependency and omit all the duplicates. A conflict occurs when the same dependency occurs in different versions in the reactor. In this case Maven will choose the nearest version and ommit the others. Occurrences of conflicting versions should be investigated and solved if possible.
The depgraph:by-groupid
goal creates a dependency graph using the groupId
of the dependencies:
Such graphs give a higher-level overview of a project, i.e. they show better which "frameworks" used by a maven project.
The goal depgraph:aggregate
creates an aggregated dependency graph on the root of a multi-module project. It shows the sub-modules with dotted black arrows and the union of all the modules' dependencies (the sub-parent
and its module-3
were excluded from the graph for clarity):
The goal depgraph:aggregate-by-groupid
does the same for the group IDs of all modules and their dependencies.
Q: Help! The dependency graph of my 10 year old 100-module enterprise project looks like a ball of wool. I can't see anything!
A: Think carefully what information you want to see in your dependency graph. Do you really want to have all third-party dependencies in your graph or do you want to see only the dependencies between your own modules? Would the groupId
graph be a better alternative?
Generally, you should consequently exclude dependencies that don't give you useful information. The inclusion/exclusion mechanisms in this plugin are quite powerful and easy to use. A good starting point is the exclusion of dependencies to "utility" libraries, such as commons-lang
, guava
or my-enterprise-project-common
. Such dependencies are typically used by every single module which is (in most cases) perfectly fine. So they don't give you much useful information when they show up in the dependency graph.
Q: Why can't I show duplicates and conflicts in the aggregated graph.
A: This does not make sense because dependencies are resolved individually for each module in the reactor. As a result, the same dependency edge in the graph could once occur as conflict, once as duplicate and once as resolved dependency.
Example:
Suppose, we have two modules module-1
and module-2
in the reactor. module-2
has a dependency to module-1
and both modules have a dependency to the third-party library commons-wtf
. module-1
references version 3.0
of this library and module-2
references version 3.1
. If we now would display conflicts in the aggregated graph, we would get these edges (amongst others):
module-1 --- 3.1 (included) ---> commons-wtf (perspective of module-1)
module-1 --- 3.1 (conflict) ---> commons-wtf (perspective of module-2)
module-2 --- 3.0 (included) ---> commons-wtf (perspective of module-2)
Such a graph is not useful whatsoever. Unless it is not possible to access all resolved dependencies within the whole reactor, we cannot show duplicates and conflicts.
Q: How do the includes
/excludes
parameters work?
A: Both parameters are a comma-separated list in the form of groupId:artifactId:type:classifier
. Not all parts need to be specified and there is wildcard support.
Examples:
- All spring-web* dependencies:
org.springframework:spring-web*
- A test jar:
com.mycompany:mylib:jar:tests
- The same test jar, but without explicit
type
partcom.mycompany:mylib::tests
A dependency will show up in the graph when it matches the includes
list and doesn't match the excludes
list.