Add flake8-debugger

[karpa4o4]

No description provided.

[karpa4o4]

@charliermarsh, hi. I tried to bring the logic as close to the original as possible, but in debugger_call it was not completely successful. I will be glad to receive feedback.

[charliermarsh]

Awesome! Will review this shortly. Thanks for putting this together.

[charliermarsh]

@karpa4o4 - I did some small refactors to use match_call_path and friends, which are some utilities we have to do this kind of "Is a function call an invocation of a specific member, in a specific module?" logic.

[charliermarsh]

But let me know if I messed anything up please :)

[karpa4o4]

@charliermarsh, thanks. Sorry, I forgot to write "Closed" in the pull request description. So issue #546 stays open.
Can I help with the implementation of some other rule?

[charliermarsh]

Oh good catch! Just closed the issue.

Can I help with the implementation of some other rule?

Definitely! There's a bunch of unclaimed stuff in #827, if you're interested in those? Alternatively, there's #458 but it's a bit more involved as I'd like it to be integrated with some of the existing docstring checks.

[charliermarsh]

Oh, or #870 -- we only need the first rule (U100). It'd probably look like the implementation we have for unused_variables, but we have to check for BindingKind::Argument.

[karpa4o4]

@charliermarsh, hi. Unfortunately I could not do the issues that you described above. But now I want to participate in the development of ruff again, can you tell me how I can help?

[charliermarsh]

No worries! If you're interested, you could consider working on the tryceratops plugin.