Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Test Group Input #61

Open
gk-tl opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

User Test Group Input #61

gk-tl opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gk-tl
Copy link
Collaborator

gk-tl commented Feb 6, 2020

@gk-tl to draft email request for feedback and circulate for project team review before sending to user test group.

Call to Action/Input request:

  1. Test drive the APP and provide general comments

  2. Review and validate benchmark routes provided by TL

  3. Provide expected route examples (screenshots)

  4. Provide responses to the following specific questions:

a) Is there value in generating routes outside Metro Vancouver, noting routes outside Metro Vancouver may only be shown on Provincial highways (no municipal roads), and will likely be displayed as "unverified routes" (dotted red line).

b) How should notices/advisories be displayed? In line with directions or in a summary "Notices & Advisory" report (or both)?

@gk-tl gk-tl changed the title User Group Testing/Input User Test Group Input Feb 6, 2020
@gk-tl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gk-tl commented Mar 13, 2020

User test group contacted on March 12, 2020. Email is attached.

Truck Route Planner - User Test Group.pdf

@mraross
Copy link

mraross commented Mar 13, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants