Reimplement CURIE prefix reconciliation for prescriptive contexts #975
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This now uses the `curies.remap_curie_prefixes` functionality, which is better tested and more flexible.
cthoyt
changed the title
|
cc @matentzn this PR slightly changes the OBO EPM to retain the previous prefix during reconciliation, but this shouldn't have any effect other than to enable better standardization |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!. |
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This now uses the
curies.remap_curie_prefixesfunctionality, which is better tested and more flexible.