General refactor #21
Merged
General refactor #21
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I had to force push again, to fix a previous commit message in case it's not being squashed. |
wilhelmer
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2022
|
Here we go, thank you! @byrnereese Could you please publish v0.6.0 on PyPI? Unfortunately, I don't have the rights to do that. |
|
@wilhelmer |
|
@wilhelmer 0.6.0 has been deployed. |
|
@byrnereese I added a small bugfix for csscompressor, please deploy v0.6.1, thanks! |
|
@wilhelmer done! Thank you! |
|
@byrnereese Another small bugfix, this time for jsmin. That's the last one for this year, I promise 😉 Please deploy v0.6.2, thanks! |
|
@wilhelmer Done! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a continuation of #20 therefore it has had its commits merged to avoid merge conflicts on second PR merge.
The rest of the commits could be squashed into 1 on merge.
It differs slightly compared to #19 as I didn't rename all of the functions and didn't change their order this time, so it should be a more manageable comparison.