Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OS#15813592 Create PropertyString for common built-in properties #4686

Merged

Conversation

agarwal-sandeep
Copy link
Collaborator

This fixes a regression in react.js from RS3 to RS4 which got introduced
when we started creating less new string object for known texts

This fixes a regression in react.js from RS3 to RS4 which got introduced
when we started creating less new string object for known texts
@obastemur
Copy link
Collaborator

:shipit:

@chakrabot chakrabot merged commit 4b432f1 into chakra-core:release/1.8 Feb 15, 2018
chakrabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2018
…common built-in properties

Merge pull request #4686 from agarwal-sandeep:createpropertystring

This fixes a regression in react.js from RS3 to RS4 which got introduced
when we started creating less new string object for known texts
chakrabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2018
…tring for common built-in properties

Merge pull request #4686 from agarwal-sandeep:createpropertystring

This fixes a regression in react.js from RS3 to RS4 which got introduced
when we started creating less new string object for known texts
chakrabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2018
…ate PropertyString for common built-in properties

Merge pull request #4686 from agarwal-sandeep:createpropertystring

This fixes a regression in react.js from RS3 to RS4 which got introduced
when we started creating less new string object for known texts
@agarwal-sandeep agarwal-sandeep deleted the createpropertystring branch March 3, 2018 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants