-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Design Review: View and manage organization Details #2543
Comments
cc/ @Katherine-Osos — adding you to this design-review issue! |
@abroddrick - quick question! Will the permission levels be ready to review with this? Or should this just be scoped to the page without the permissions piece? |
I was not at all considering User permission management as part of this milestone, as that is a whole other can of worms. So no permissions management and viewing permissions were not be included. So basically, just details specific to the organization itself not Users in the org |
Re-added |
Hey @katypies! The domain management review has been going well. We have gotten started on reviewing and Rachid has already addresses some issues. |
Dev team effort is 2 story point, per @abroddrick |
Design has approved PR for 2734 ✅ |
Reopening the issue as we don't want it closed before the code is approved by dev and merged to main |
#2543: Org feature org pages review - [BOB] - MIGRATIONS
Issue description
In the org model, all org users should be able see information about their organization. Admins can change their organization, but no one else can. No org user can change the Senior official in these pages.
Design should review and compare the output for the organization details and compare against the most recent figma and requirements.
Acceptance criteria
Additional context
Working with dev: Dev effort on this shouldn't be more than a "2" (2 full work days).
NOTE: This design review does not include testing permissions and/or sending emails. That will be tested separately once that work is implemented.
Temporary Slack channel
Discussions for this design review should take place in this Slack channel: #2543-design-review
Links to other issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: