Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove versioning in docker-compose.yml #2478

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

therealslimhsiehdy
Copy link
Contributor

@therealslimhsiehdy therealslimhsiehdy commented Jul 18, 2024

Ticket

Resolves #00

See slack thread for the versioning and NPM issues we were running into here and the errors

Changes

  • Change 1
  • Change 2

Context for reviewers

Setup

Code Review Verification Steps

As the original developer, I have

Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards

  • Met the acceptance criteria, or will meet them in a subsequent PR
  • Created/modified automated tests
  • Added at least 2 developers as PR reviewers (only 1 will need to approve)
  • Messaged on Slack or in standup to notify the team that a PR is ready for review
  • Changes to “how we do things” are documented in READMEs and or onboarding guide
  • If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the associated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)

  • All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
  • Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?
  • Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
  • Error handling exists for unusual or missing values

Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)

  • New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
  • Checked keyboard navigability
  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
  • Add at least 1 designer as PR reviewer

As a code reviewer, I have

Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes

  • Pulled this branch locally and tested it
  • Reviewed this code and left comments
  • Checked that all code is adequately covered by tests
  • Made it clear which comments need to be addressed before this work is merged
  • If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the associated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)

  • All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
  • Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
  • Error handling exists for unusual or missing values
  • (Rarely needed) Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?

Validated user-facing changes as a developer

  • New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing

  • Checked keyboard navigability

  • Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product

  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)

  • Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)

    • Chrome
    • Microsoft Edge
    • FireFox
    • Safari
  • (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist

As a designer reviewer, I have

Verified that the changes match the design intention

  • Checked that the design translated visually
  • Checked behavior
  • Checked different states (empty, one, some, error)
  • Checked for landmarks, page heading structure, and links
  • Tried to break the intended flow

Validated user-facing changes as a designer

  • Checked keyboard navigability

  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)

  • Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)

    • Chrome
    • Microsoft Edge
    • FireFox
    • Safari
  • (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Screenshots

Copy link
Contributor

@abroddrick abroddrick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested and works for me

@zandercymatics
Copy link
Contributor

zandercymatics commented Jul 19, 2024

Looks like we're getting a failure on our other jobs, too!

@zandercymatics
Copy link
Contributor

zandercymatics commented Jul 19, 2024

we're getting a exit handler bug on npm itself. It looks like we may (potentially) need to revert the version on node, again:

npm/cli#7657

@abroddrick / @therealslimhsiehdy

@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Compile USWDS assets
working-directory: ./src
run: |
docker compose run node npm install npm@latest &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@therealslimhsiehdy add this to deploy-sandbox.yaml and deploy-development.yaml. If after merging we have no issues then we can add to the staging and stable deploys too

@abroddrick
Copy link
Contributor

we're getting a exit handler bug on npm itself. It looks like we may (potentially) need to revert the version on node, again:

npm/cli#7657

@abroddrick / @therealslimhsiehdy

Zander, the build pulls off of main. It is not utilizing her changes at all. Yaml changes need to merge to main to take effect unless you have a workflow (like the manual deploy workflow) that can deploy based on a particular branch of code. The deploy failing here is irrelevant

Copy link

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox rh.

Copy link
Contributor

@abroddrick abroddrick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve, let's try it! If it goes to development fine and we can re-deploy the failing PRs successfully we can add the same line to stable/staging

Copy link
Contributor

@zandercymatics zandercymatics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@therealslimhsiehdy therealslimhsiehdy merged commit acf5276 into main Jul 19, 2024
10 checks passed
@therealslimhsiehdy therealslimhsiehdy deleted the rh/fix-versioning branch July 19, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants