We can do this because new versions of ansible-core (2.16.7 and
2.17.0) have been released that do not suffer from the bug discussed
in ansible/ansible#82702.  This bug broke any symlinked files in vars,
tasks, etc. for any Ansible role installed via ansible-galaxy.

All versions later than ansible-core 2.16.7 and 2.17.0 should function
as expected.

New versions of ansible-core (2.16.7 and 2.17.0) have been released
that do not suffer from the bug discussed in ansible/ansible#82702.
This bug broke any symlinked files in vars, tasks, etc. for any
Ansible role installed via ansible-galaxy.

All versions later than ansible-core 2.16.7 and 2.17.0 should function
as expected.

Co-authored-by: Nick <50747025+mcdonnnj@users.noreply.github.com>

The line is not only unnecessary, it was commented out to boot!

…lint

On its own ansible-lint does not pull in ansible, only ansible-core.
Therefore, if an Ansible module lives in ansible instead of
ansible-core, the linter will complain that the module is unknown.  In
these cases it is necessary to add the ansible package itself as an
additional dependency, with the same pinning as is done in
requirements-test.txt of cisagov/skeleton-ansible-role.

This is done automatically with the `pre-commit autoupdate` command.
The pre-commit/mirrors-prettier was manually held back because the
latest tags are for alpha releases of the next major version.

Use the latest v3 release available from NPM.

The pin now agrees with what is in cisagov/skeleton-ansible-role.

Co-authored-by: Nick <50747025+mcdonnnj@users.noreply.github.com>

Update `pre-commit` hooks

…ible-lint

Pin packages for `ansible-lint`

Update version pin on `ansible-core` Python package

Lineage pull request for: skeleton

This is more flexible than filtering the architecture just based on
the name, particularly since the name filter does not support
full-fledged regexes.

This should make the search more efficient.

This will allow us to build both x86-64 and ARM64 versions of our AMI.

In order that the builds should complete as soon as possible, the
different architectures are built in parallel.

We want to be able to offer both wherever possible.

Co-authored-by: Nick <50747025+mcdonnnj@users.noreply.github.com>

…sions

Co-authored-by: Nick <50747025+mcdonnnj@users.noreply.github.com>

Also reference issue cisagov/skeleton-packer#369 to consider removing
the moved blocks when they are no longer necessary.

Co-authored-by: David Redmin <david.redmin@gwe.cisa.dhs.gov>

…s-as-separate-filter

Build both ARM64 and x86-64 AMIs

…keleton

Nessus does not support ARM64 on Debian.