-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement for HammerDB doc generation/indexing #120
Conversation
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
@mkarg75 , I'm concerned that the results you get from minishift might not match the results other people get from OCP4 or from minikube. Does that make sense? If so, any chance you can try this with version of minikube recommended by Russ or whoever in outcome of ripsaw issue 272 ? |
also would like to see this patch in snafu/hammerdb/hammerd_wrapper.py:
or something equivalent to it, where benchmark doesn't just silently fail. |
…e ES document generation fails
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
hammerdb/Dockerfile
Outdated
COPY . /opt/snafu | ||
# clone the snafu repo | ||
#RUN cd /opt/; git clone https://github.com/mkarg75/snafu.git | ||
RUN cd /opt/; git clone https://github.com/cloud-bulldozer/snafu.git |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is not required, as snafu is in the build context of the image.
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
@mkarg75 looks like hammer was successful however it failed ci because it couldn't find any results in ES.
|
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
@mkarg75 why the revert from the ubi8 Dockerfile? |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
/rerun all |
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a bunch of tcl files that are also added but I don't see them being used in the dockerfile (and no change to ripsaw was merged yet) ? So are they really required @mkarg75 ? If they're not can only the files/changes required be in this PR?
hammerdb/build_container.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
#!/bin/bash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please remove this file?
hammerdb/entrypoint
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | |||
#!/usr/bin/env bash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't this file make uid_entrypoint file redundant ? in that case can we remove one from the other ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see this added to the dockerfile as well?
Results for SNAFU CI Test
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
hopefully the last one