Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Index uperf timestamp field #424

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

rsevilla87
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Raul Sevilla rsevilla@redhat.com

Description

For historical reasons I unknown, we're sending the uperf timestamp in a field called uperf_ts rather than timestamp like every other tests. Let's send add this timestamp field and keep the uperf_ts one for now to maintain compatibility .

Signed-off-by: Raul Sevilla <rsevilla@redhat.com>
@rsevilla87 rsevilla87 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #424 (4038bb7) into master (88e8d0a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #424   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   39.35%   39.35%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         869      869           
=======================================
  Hits          342      342           
  Misses        527      527           
Flag Coverage Δ
gha 39.35% <ø> (ø)
python-3.6 39.35% <ø> (ø)
unit 39.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88e8d0a...4038bb7. Read the comment docs.

@rsevilla87 rsevilla87 merged commit 91036c4 into cloud-bulldozer:master Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants