-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define a property to deserialize as generic record when specific record class not found #795
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Define a property to deserialize as generic record when specific record class not found #795
Conversation
It looks like @emersonborges hasn't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
You can read and sign our full Contributor License Agreement here. Once you've signed reply with Appreciation of efforts, clabot |
[clabot:check] |
It looks like @emersonborges hasn't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
You can read and sign our full Contributor License Agreement here. Once you've signed reply with Appreciation of efforts, clabot |
[clabot:check] |
@confluentinc It looks like @emersonborges just signed our Contributor License Agreement. 👍 Always at your service, clabot |
@emersonborges Thanks a lot for the PR. I would like to understand a little bit more about the use-case/issue that you are trying to address here. Why would someone choose to configure to use a Specific Record but not have the appropriate class for it? This would help me take this PR forward. |
@emersonborges Just wanted to check to see if you had any updates on the question that I had regarding the context for this PR? |
Hello guys - any update on this bug? |
Hi everyone. |
|
What was done:
SPECIFIC_AVRO_READER_UNKNOWN_AS_GENERIC_CONFIG
. When is true, ifSPECIFIC_AVRO_READER_CONFIG
is enabled, it will deserialize as generic record if specific record class was not found.SpecificRecordClassNotFound
) to allow consumer to handle properly.For more details: #791