fix: error when calculating sha256 on big files #1094
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: lstocchi <lstocchi@redhat.com>
jeffmaury
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
My thought was that one could have a model already in the machine downloaded manually and we verify it before using it, no? Should i remove the check? |
|
Merging it for the moment so we don't have a broken main branch but let me know what to do |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
It avoid reading a huge file all at once, resulting in a failure when trying to calculate sha256
Screenshot / video of UI
N/A
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
it resolves #1093
How to test this PR?