Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Misc cleanup
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
OR13 committed Aug 16, 2024
1 parent 9f7ab10 commit 5078ad1
Showing 1 changed file with 79 additions and 23 deletions.
102 changes: 79 additions & 23 deletions draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ normative:
RFC9052: RFC9052

informative:
BCP205:

--- abstract

Expand All @@ -57,6 +58,16 @@ Storing a hash of the content allows for small signature envelopes, that are eas

Additional hints in the protected header ensure cryptographic agility for the hashing & signing algorithms, and discoverability for the original content which could be prohibitively large to move over a network.

When producing COSE_sign1 with remote signing services, such as a signing api exposed over HTTPS and backed by an HSM, the "ToBeSigned" bytes as described in Section 4.4 of RFC 9052 need to be transmitted to the HSM in order to be signed.

Some signature algorithms such as ES256 or ES384 allow the "ToBeSigned" to be hashed on the client and sent to the server along with metadata in order to produce a signature.

Other signature algorithms such as EdDSA with Ed25519, or ML-DSA do not expose such a capability.

By producing the "ToBeSigned" on the client, and ensuring that the payload is always a hashed value, the total size of the message to be sent to the servce for signing is constrained.

It is still possible for the protected header to be large, but the payload will always be of a fixed size, associated with the hash function chosen.

## Attached Payload

COSE_sign1 envelope with an attached payload, providing for signature validation.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -107,13 +118,13 @@ A hashed payload functions equivalently to an attached payload, with the benefit
To represent a hash of a payload, the following headers are defined:

TBD_1:
: the hash algorithm used to generate the hash of the payload
: the hash algorithm used to produce the payload.

TBD_2:
: the content type of the payload the hash represents
: the content type of the bytes that were hashed to produce the payload.

TBD_3:
: an identifier enabling a verifier to retrieve the full payload preimage.
: an identifier enabling a verifier to retrieve the bytes which were hashed to produce the payload.

## Signed Hash Envelopes Example

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -158,30 +169,38 @@ Hash_Envelope_as_COSE_Sign1 = [
Hash_Envelope = #6.18(Hash_Envelope_as_COSE_Sign1)
~~~

## Protected Header

Label `16` (typ), label `TBD_1` (payload hash alg) and label `TBD_2` (content type of the preimage of the payload) MUST be present in the protected header and MUST NOT be present in the unprotected header.
## Headers

Label `16` (typ) MAY be used to assign a content format or media type to the entire hash envelope.
Label `TBD_1` (payload hash alg) MUST be present in the protected header and MUST NOT be present in the unprotected header.
Label `TBD_2` (content type of the preimage of the payload) MAY be present in the protected header or unprotected header.
Label `TBD_3` (payload_location) MAY be added to the protected header and MUST NOT be presented in the unprotected header.

Label `3` (content_type) MUST NOT be used as it is easily confused with label `TBD_2` payload_preimage_content_type).
Label `3` (content_type) MUST NOT be present in the protected or unprotected headers.
Label `3` is easily confused with label `TBD_2` payload_preimage_content_type.
The difference between content_type (3) and payload_preimage_content_type (TBD2) is that content_type is used to identify the content format associated with payload, whereas payload_preimage_content_type is used to identify the content format of the bytes which are hashed to produce the payload.

For example:

~~~~ cbor-diag
{
/ alg : ES384 / 1: -35,
/ kid / 4: h'75726e3a...32636573',
/ typ / 16: application/hashed+cose
/ payload_hash_alg sha-256 / TBD_1: 1
/ payload_preimage_content_type / TBD_2: application/jwk+json
/ payload_location / TBD_3 : storage.example/244f...9c19
/ typ / 16: "application/example+cose"
/ payload_hash_alg sha-256 / TBD_1: -16
/ payload_preimage_content_type / TBD_2: "application/example+json"
/ payload_location / TBD_3 : "https://storage.example/244f" + ... "9c19"
}
~~~~

In this example, the sha256 hash algorithm (-16) is used to hash the payload, which is of content type "application/example+json".
The full payload is located at "https://storage.example/244f...9c19".
The entire cose sign1 is of type "application/example+cose".
The sha256 hash is signed with ES384 which starts by taking the sha384 hash of the payload (which is a sha256 hash).

# Encrypted Hashes

The cose headers defined in this document SHOULD NOT be used in unprotected or protected headers associated with COSE_Encrypt.
When present in COSE_Encrypt, the header parameters registered in this document leak information about the ciphertext.
These parameters SHOULD NOT be present in COSE_Encrypt headers unless this disclosure is acceptable.

# Security Considerations

Expand All @@ -200,28 +219,65 @@ For example, when signing with ECDSA using P-256 and SHA-256, use SHA-256 to has

## COSE Header Algorithm Parameters

- Name: payload hash algorithm
### Payload Hash Algorithm

- Name: payload_hash_alg
- Label: TBD_1
- Value type: int
- Value registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/named-information/named-information.xhtml
- Value registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/cose.xhtml#algorithms
- Description: Hash algorithm used to produce the payload.

## Named Information Hash Algorithm Registry

- Name: SHAKE256
### Payload Pre-image Content Type

- Name: payload_preimage_content_type
- Label: TBD_2
- Value type: int
- Value registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/named-information/named-information.xhtml
- Description: SHAKE256 a described in https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.202.pdf
- Value registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters/core-parameters.xhtml#content-formats
- Description: The content format associated with the bytes that were hashed to produce the payload.

- Name: ASCON128
### Payload Location

- Name: payload_location
- Label: TBD_3
- Value type: int
- Value registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/named-information/named-information.xhtml
- Description: ASCON128 a described in https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/lightweight-cryptography/documents/round-2/spec-doc-rnd2/ascon-spec-round2.pdf
- Value type: tstr
- Value registry: none
- Description: A string or URI as a hint for the location of the payload

--- back

# Implementation Status

Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section as well as references to {{BCP205}} before AUTH48.

This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in {{BCP205}}.
The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs.
Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors.
This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features.
Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist.

According to {{BCP205}}, "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature.
It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit".

## Transmute Prototype

Organization: Transmute Industries Inc

Name: https://github.com/transmute-industries/transmute

Description: A command line tool and GitHub action for securing software artifacts in GitHub workflows.

Maturity: Prototype

Coverage: The current version ('main') implements this specification and demonstrates hash envelope signing with Azure Key Vault and Google Cloud KMS in addition to supporting local keys.

License: Apache-2.0

Implementation Experience: No interop testing has been done yet. The code works as proof of concept, but is not yet production ready.

Contact: Orie Steele (orie@transmute.industries)

# Acknowledgments
{:numbered="false"}

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5078ad1

Please sign in to comment.