Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

e2e: check that IBC tokens on destination chain have metadata #4642

Conversation

crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #3768

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

e2e/go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 108 to 117
if testvalues.TokenMetadataFeatureReleases.IsSupported(chainBVersion) {
t.Run("metadata for token exists on chainB", func(t *testing.T) {
balances, err := chainB.AllBalances(ctx, chainBAddress, true)
s.Require().NoError(err)

// balance for IBC token returns a human-readable denomination
s.Require().Equal(chainBIBCToken.GetFullDenomPath(), balances[1].Denom)
})
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah it looks like we have been doing some overlapping work. I have a similar thing in this PR however I did not know we already had `TokenMetadataFeatureReleases!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I just added it for this test. We can fix the merge conflicts later.

…all-balances-response-returns-human-readable-denomination

# Conflicts:
#	e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go
Copy link
Contributor

@colin-axner colin-axner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @crodriguezvega! And thank you for adding the bank grpc 🙏

…all-balances-response-returns-human-readable-denomination
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 242cb9f into main Sep 15, 2023
55 checks passed
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the carlos/3768-check-in-transfer-e2e-test-that-all-balances-response-returns-human-readable-denomination branch September 15, 2023 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check in transfer e2e test that all balances response returns human-readable denomination
3 participants