Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport 6982 to 1.4.latest #7074

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Backport 6982 to 1.4.latest #7074

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

Backporting to include in v1.4.x patch, by request: #6900 (comment)

I'm not sure why the backport action didn't work. I just cherry-picked this one manually.

Signed-off-by: Niels Pardon <par@zurich.ibm.com>
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 requested a review from leahwicz March 3, 2023 12:13
@leahwicz
Copy link
Contributor

leahwicz commented Mar 7, 2023

@jtcohen6 do we plan to release an RC for this first? I hesitate to backport this without any tests

@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor Author

@leahwicz Yes, we'd want to do an RC for this first. It's not very urgent, since it's solving for a pretty niche use case. We could wait to combine it with other bug fixes that need backporting for inclusion in v1.4.x (if any more do).

@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 merged commit 30f8c62 into 1.4.latest Apr 4, 2023
@jtcohen6 jtcohen6 deleted the backport-6982-to-1.4 branch April 4, 2023 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants