feat(InteractionResponses): support with_response query parameter

[monbrey]

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
Closes #10498

/core done in #10512

Status and versioning classification:

• Code changes have been tested against the Discord API, or there are no code changes
• I know how to update typings and have done so, or typings don't need updating
• This PR changes the library's interface (methods or parameters added)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
discord-js	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 17, 2024 10:07pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
discord-js-guide	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 17, 2024 10:07pm

[Jiralite]

This also required a discord-api-types version bump

We'll wait for #10488 before this one lands.

[Jiralite]

I see the interaction callback resource contains any message created. If this is a good enough alternative to options.fetchReply, I say we should deprecate it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.49%. Comparing base (cda8d88) to head (8b69bd4).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10499      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.48%   35.49%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         228      228              
  Lines       14308    14303       -5     
  Branches     1254     1254              
==========================================
  Hits         5077     5077              
+ Misses       9187     9182       -5     
  Partials       44       44              

Flag	Coverage Δ
guide	0.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

stale