Add IColumnModification and IModificationCommand to allow the implementations to be replaced easily #25327
Conversation
AndriySvyryd
force-pushed
the
Issue23027
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a0e9e2f
to
721fe78
Compare
|
Hello @AndriySvyryd Tested. Is ok. Thanks. |
AndriySvyryd
force-pushed
the
Issue23027
branch
5 times, most recently
from
1c02b4d
to
94eaea9
Compare
|
Hello @AndriySvyryd! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
|
Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:
These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check. Give feedback on thisFrom the bot dev teamWe've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments. Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin. |
|
Hello EFCore team, Provider, uses this feature, was released Thanks for IColumnModification and the help with other issues. Отдельное спасибо Андрею. Dmitry Kovalenko. |
Fixes #23027
Fixes #12169
Fixes #17946
Co-authored-by: Kovalenko Dmitry dmitry.lipetsk@gmail.com