Update hardcoded rids for targeting/runtime pks #48459
Conversation
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @ViktorHofer Issue DetailsThe rids in the 6.0 Preview 1 SDK differ to the hardcoded ones in our repo which caused CLI errors locally.
|
Yeah, that's a known issue. That should require: #43952 in order to be fixed, or calculate the set of dependencies correctly for Mono runtime tests. @naricc do you have an update on that issue? |
| @@ -15,15 +19,15 @@ | |||
| LatestRuntimeFrameworkVersion="$(ProductVersion)" | |||
| RuntimeFrameworkName="$(SharedFrameworkName)" | |||
| RuntimePackNamePatterns="$(SharedFrameworkName).Runtime.**RID**" | |||
| RuntimePackRuntimeIdentifiers="linux-arm;linux-arm64;linux-musl-arm64;linux-musl-x64;linux-x64;osx-x64;rhel.6-x64;tizen.4.0.0-armel;tizen.5.0.0-armel;win-arm;win-arm64;win-x64;win-x86;ios-arm64;ios-arm;ios-x64;ios-x86;tvos-arm64;tvos-x64;android-arm64;android-arm;android-x64;android-x86;browser-wasm" | |||
| RuntimePackRuntimeIdentifiers="linux-arm;linux-arm64;linux-musl-arm64;linux-musl-x64;linux-x64;osx-x64;rhel.6-x64;tizen.4.0.0-armel;tizen.5.0.0-armel;win-arm;win-arm64;win-x64;win-x86;linux-musl-arm;ios-arm64;ios-arm;ios-x64;ios-x86;tvos-arm64;tvos-x64;android-arm64;android-arm;android-x64;android-x86;browser-wasm;osx-arm64" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should the SDK have a property that exposes the RIDs that it supports?
|
@safern As we discussed in the issue, we decided the best way to do it build a corerun that uses mono. I will be working on that next week. |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
The rids in the 6.0 Preview 1 SDK differ to the hardcoded ones in our repo which caused CLI errors locally.