Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid some unnecessary static readonly arrays #72727

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 24, 2022

Conversation

stephentoub
Copy link
Member

These changes are factored out of #70179, which is looking more and more unlikely to land for .NET 7 (the compiler changes it depends on haven't been merged yet as they depend on a versioning issue that hasn't been sorted out yet). This set of changes doesn't depend on those compiler features.

@stephentoub stephentoub added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 24, 2022
@ghost ghost assigned stephentoub Jul 24, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 24, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

These changes are factored out of #70179, which is looking more and more unlikely to land for .NET 7 (the compiler changes it depends on haven't been merged yet as they depend on a versioning issue that hasn't been sorted out yet). This set of changes doesn't depend on those compiler features.

Author: stephentoub
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Meta

Milestone: 7.0.0

Copy link
Member

@jkotas jkotas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@stephentoub stephentoub merged commit 214ca6d into dotnet:main Jul 24, 2022
@stephentoub stephentoub deleted the unnecessaryarrays branch July 24, 2022 22:50
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants