Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/7.0] Fix servicing failures when building coreclr nuget packages #75899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2022

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #75884 to release/7.0

/cc @ViktorHofer

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Fixes the failures in the 7.0.1 test servicing build:

```
/__w/1/s/.packages/microsoft.dotnet.build.tasks.packaging/7.0.0-beta.22416.1/build/Packaging.targets(800,5): error : No VersionSuffix was set. Ensure it is set before targets in packaging are ran. [/__w/1/s/src/coreclr/.nuget/Microsoft.NETCore.ILAsm/Microsoft.NETCore.ILAsm.pkgproj]
##[error].packages/microsoft.dotnet.build.tasks.packaging/7.0.0-beta.22416.1/build/Packaging.targets(800,5): error : (NETCORE_ENGINEERING_TELEMETRY=Build) No VersionSuffix was set. Ensure it is set before targets in packaging are ran.
/__w/1/s/.packages/microsoft.dotnet.build.tasks.packaging/7.0.0-beta.22416.1/build/Packaging.targets(800,5): error : No VersionSuffix was set. Ensure it is set before targets in packaging are ran. [/__w/1/s/src/coreclr/.nuget/Microsoft.NETCore.ILDAsm/Microsoft.NETCore.ILDAsm.pkgproj]
##[error].packages/microsoft.dotnet.build.tasks.packaging/7.0.0-beta.22416.1/build/Packaging.targets(800,5): error : (NETCORE_ENGINEERING_TELEMETRY=Build) No VersionSuffix was set. Ensure it is set before targets in packaging are ran.
```
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 20, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #75884 to release/7.0

/cc @ViktorHofer

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author: github-actions[bot]
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone: -

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT this infrastructure change is necessary to successfully build 7.0.x servicing bits. This was already part of release/6.0 but was never forward ported into main. Please see the linked issue for more details.

I assume this is a tell-mode only change and can be merged without additional approvals?

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. agree this is tell mode. is the failing ci related?

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

I don't think so. Seems to be another AzDO flakiness/outage:

##[warning]Git fetch failed with exit code 128, back off 7.517 seconds before retry.
git --config-env=http.extraheader=env_var_http.extraheader fetch --force --tags --prune --prune-tags --progress --no-recurse-submodules origin --depth=20 +1986e7a0aa0866dfc873111fe13f1907888f5ec4:refs/remotes/origin/1986e7a0aa0866dfc873111fe13f1907888f5ec4
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/': The requested URL returned error: 429
##[error]Git fetch failed with exit code: 128

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit 473b312 into release/7.0 Sep 21, 2022
@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-75884-to-release/7.0 branch September 21, 2022 11:19
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants